Cargando…

The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks

Recent infectious disease outbreaks have resulted in renewed recognition of the importance of risk communication planning and execution to public health control strategies. Key to these efforts is public access to information that is understandable, reliable and meets their needs for informed decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jardine, Cynthia G., Boerner, Franziska U., Boyd, Amanda D., Driedger, S. Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26485302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140028
_version_ 1782396879060860928
author Jardine, Cynthia G.
Boerner, Franziska U.
Boyd, Amanda D.
Driedger, S. Michelle
author_facet Jardine, Cynthia G.
Boerner, Franziska U.
Boyd, Amanda D.
Driedger, S. Michelle
author_sort Jardine, Cynthia G.
collection PubMed
description Recent infectious disease outbreaks have resulted in renewed recognition of the importance of risk communication planning and execution to public health control strategies. Key to these efforts is public access to information that is understandable, reliable and meets their needs for informed decision-making on protective health behaviours. Learning from the trends in sources used in previous outbreaks will enable improvements in information access in future outbreaks. Two separate random-digit dialled telephone surveys were conducted in Alberta, Canada, to explore information sources used by the public, together with their perceived usefulness and credibility, during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic (n = 1209) and 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic (n = 1206). Traditional mass media were the most used information sources in both surveys. Although use of the Internet increased from 25% during SARS to 56% during H1N1, overall use of social media was not as high as anticipated. Friends and relatives were commonly used as an information source, but were not deemed very useful or credible. Conversely, doctors and health professionals were considered credible, but not consulted as frequently. The use of five or more information sources increased by almost 60% between the SARS and H1N1 surveys. There was a shift to older, more educated and more affluent respondents between the surveys, most likely caused by a decrease in the use of landlines amongst younger Canadians. It was concluded that people are increasingly using multiple sources of health risk information, presumably in a complementary manner. Subsequently, although using online media is important, this should be used to augment rather than replace more traditional information channels. Efforts should be made to improve knowledge transfer to health care professionals and doctors and provide them with opportunities to be more accessible as information sources. Finally, the future use of telephone surveys needs to account for the changing demographics of the respondents accessed through such surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4618063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46180632015-10-29 The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks Jardine, Cynthia G. Boerner, Franziska U. Boyd, Amanda D. Driedger, S. Michelle PLoS One Research Article Recent infectious disease outbreaks have resulted in renewed recognition of the importance of risk communication planning and execution to public health control strategies. Key to these efforts is public access to information that is understandable, reliable and meets their needs for informed decision-making on protective health behaviours. Learning from the trends in sources used in previous outbreaks will enable improvements in information access in future outbreaks. Two separate random-digit dialled telephone surveys were conducted in Alberta, Canada, to explore information sources used by the public, together with their perceived usefulness and credibility, during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic (n = 1209) and 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic (n = 1206). Traditional mass media were the most used information sources in both surveys. Although use of the Internet increased from 25% during SARS to 56% during H1N1, overall use of social media was not as high as anticipated. Friends and relatives were commonly used as an information source, but were not deemed very useful or credible. Conversely, doctors and health professionals were considered credible, but not consulted as frequently. The use of five or more information sources increased by almost 60% between the SARS and H1N1 surveys. There was a shift to older, more educated and more affluent respondents between the surveys, most likely caused by a decrease in the use of landlines amongst younger Canadians. It was concluded that people are increasingly using multiple sources of health risk information, presumably in a complementary manner. Subsequently, although using online media is important, this should be used to augment rather than replace more traditional information channels. Efforts should be made to improve knowledge transfer to health care professionals and doctors and provide them with opportunities to be more accessible as information sources. Finally, the future use of telephone surveys needs to account for the changing demographics of the respondents accessed through such surveys. Public Library of Science 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4618063/ /pubmed/26485302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140028 Text en © 2015 Jardine et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jardine, Cynthia G.
Boerner, Franziska U.
Boyd, Amanda D.
Driedger, S. Michelle
The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_full The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_fullStr The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_full_unstemmed The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_short The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_sort more the better? a comparison of the information sources used by the public during two infectious disease outbreaks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26485302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140028
work_keys_str_mv AT jardinecynthiag themorethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT boernerfranziskau themorethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT boydamandad themorethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT driedgersmichelle themorethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT jardinecynthiag morethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT boernerfranziskau morethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT boydamandad morethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT driedgersmichelle morethebetteracomparisonoftheinformationsourcesusedbythepublicduringtwoinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks