Cargando…

Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations

The purpose of this study was to compare the chromosomal genotype between breast cancers with and without secondary manifestations and between primary tumors and their secondary manifestations. Eighty six breast cancers, twenty lymph node metastases, ten distant metastases and ten local recurrences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedrich, Katrin, Weber, Theresa, Scheithauer, Jens, Meyer, Wolfdietrich, Haroske, Gunter, Kunze, Klaus Dietmar, Baretton, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/209142
_version_ 1782396945235443712
author Friedrich, Katrin
Weber, Theresa
Scheithauer, Jens
Meyer, Wolfdietrich
Haroske, Gunter
Kunze, Klaus Dietmar
Baretton, Gustavo
author_facet Friedrich, Katrin
Weber, Theresa
Scheithauer, Jens
Meyer, Wolfdietrich
Haroske, Gunter
Kunze, Klaus Dietmar
Baretton, Gustavo
author_sort Friedrich, Katrin
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the chromosomal genotype between breast cancers with and without secondary manifestations and between primary tumors and their secondary manifestations. Eighty six breast cancers, twenty lymph node metastases, ten distant metastases and ten local recurrences were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Tumors with local recurrences showed significant more frequent losses at 2q32 than the tumors without recurrences. Lymph node positive cases showed significant more frequent losses at 9p21 than node negative cases. Lymph node metastases exhibited significant more frequent losses at 7q11, 14q24.3–q31 and 17q22–q24 than their primary tumors. In cases with distant metastases, losses at 5q23 were more frequent than in those without, but not reaching the significance level. The distant metastases showed significant more frequent losses at 5p15, 12q24 and 17q22–q24 than the primary tumors. These results reveal strong evidence that the potential for progression is determined in the primary tumor and that different ways of the development of local recurrences, lymph node and distant metastases exist. After confirmation of the results by interphase FISH on tissue micro arrays, the detection of these specific chromosomal imbalances may contribute to a more individual prediction of prognosis in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4618578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46185782016-01-12 Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations Friedrich, Katrin Weber, Theresa Scheithauer, Jens Meyer, Wolfdietrich Haroske, Gunter Kunze, Klaus Dietmar Baretton, Gustavo Cell Oncol Other The purpose of this study was to compare the chromosomal genotype between breast cancers with and without secondary manifestations and between primary tumors and their secondary manifestations. Eighty six breast cancers, twenty lymph node metastases, ten distant metastases and ten local recurrences were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Tumors with local recurrences showed significant more frequent losses at 2q32 than the tumors without recurrences. Lymph node positive cases showed significant more frequent losses at 9p21 than node negative cases. Lymph node metastases exhibited significant more frequent losses at 7q11, 14q24.3–q31 and 17q22–q24 than their primary tumors. In cases with distant metastases, losses at 5q23 were more frequent than in those without, but not reaching the significance level. The distant metastases showed significant more frequent losses at 5p15, 12q24 and 17q22–q24 than the primary tumors. These results reveal strong evidence that the potential for progression is determined in the primary tumor and that different ways of the development of local recurrences, lymph node and distant metastases exist. After confirmation of the results by interphase FISH on tissue micro arrays, the detection of these specific chromosomal imbalances may contribute to a more individual prediction of prognosis in breast cancer. IOS Press 2008 2008-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4618578/ /pubmed/18219109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/209142 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Friedrich, Katrin
Weber, Theresa
Scheithauer, Jens
Meyer, Wolfdietrich
Haroske, Gunter
Kunze, Klaus Dietmar
Baretton, Gustavo
Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title_full Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title_fullStr Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title_short Chromosomal Genotype in Breast Cancer Progression: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Manifestations
title_sort chromosomal genotype in breast cancer progression: comparison of primary and secondary manifestations
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/209142
work_keys_str_mv AT friedrichkatrin chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT webertheresa chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT scheithauerjens chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT meyerwolfdietrich chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT haroskegunter chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT kunzeklausdietmar chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations
AT barettongustavo chromosomalgenotypeinbreastcancerprogressioncomparisonofprimaryandsecondarymanifestations