Cargando…
A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are the two main types of esophageal cancer. Despite extensive research the exact molecular basis of these cancers is unclear. Therefore we evaluated the transcriptome of EA in comparison to non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/328529 |
_version_ | 1782397013763031040 |
---|---|
author | van Baal, Jantine W. P. M. Milana, Francesco Rygiel, Agnieszka M. Sondermeijer, Carine M. T. Spek, C. Arnold Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. |
author_facet | van Baal, Jantine W. P. M. Milana, Francesco Rygiel, Agnieszka M. Sondermeijer, Carine M. T. Spek, C. Arnold Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. |
author_sort | van Baal, Jantine W. P. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are the two main types of esophageal cancer. Despite extensive research the exact molecular basis of these cancers is unclear. Therefore we evaluated the transcriptome of EA in comparison to non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (BE), the metaplastic epithelium that predisposes for EA, and compared the transcriptome of ESCC to normal esophageal squamous epithelium. For obtaining the transcriptomes tissue biopsies were used and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) was applied. Validation of results by RT-PCR and immunoblotting was performed using tissues of an additional 23 EA and ESCC patients. Over 58,000 tags were sequenced. Between EA and BE 1013, and between ESCC and normal squamous epithelium 1235 tags were significantly differentially expressed (p < 0.05). The most up-regulated genes in EA compared to BE were SRY-box 4 and Lipocalin2, whereas the most down-regulated genes in EA were Trefoil factors and Annexin A10. The most up-regulated genes in ESCC compared to normal squamous epithelium were BMP4, E-Cadherin and TFF3. The results could suggest that the BE expression profile is closer related to normal squamous esophagus then to EA. In addition, several uniquely expressed genes are identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4618979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46189792016-01-12 A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma van Baal, Jantine W. P. M. Milana, Francesco Rygiel, Agnieszka M. Sondermeijer, Carine M. T. Spek, C. Arnold Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Cell Oncol Other Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are the two main types of esophageal cancer. Despite extensive research the exact molecular basis of these cancers is unclear. Therefore we evaluated the transcriptome of EA in comparison to non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (BE), the metaplastic epithelium that predisposes for EA, and compared the transcriptome of ESCC to normal esophageal squamous epithelium. For obtaining the transcriptomes tissue biopsies were used and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) was applied. Validation of results by RT-PCR and immunoblotting was performed using tissues of an additional 23 EA and ESCC patients. Over 58,000 tags were sequenced. Between EA and BE 1013, and between ESCC and normal squamous epithelium 1235 tags were significantly differentially expressed (p < 0.05). The most up-regulated genes in EA compared to BE were SRY-box 4 and Lipocalin2, whereas the most down-regulated genes in EA were Trefoil factors and Annexin A10. The most up-regulated genes in ESCC compared to normal squamous epithelium were BMP4, E-Cadherin and TFF3. The results could suggest that the BE expression profile is closer related to normal squamous esophagus then to EA. In addition, several uniquely expressed genes are identified. IOS Press 2008 2008-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4618979/ /pubmed/18219111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/328529 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors. |
spellingShingle | Other van Baal, Jantine W. P. M. Milana, Francesco Rygiel, Agnieszka M. Sondermeijer, Carine M. T. Spek, C. Arnold Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title | A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | A comparative Analysis by SAGE of Gene Expression Profiles of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparative analysis by sage of gene expression profiles of esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/328529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbaaljantinewpm acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT milanafrancesco acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT rygielagnieszkam acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT sondermeijercarinemt acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT spekcarnold acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT bergmanjacquesjghm acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT peppelenboschmaikelp acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT krishnadathkausiliak acomparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT vanbaaljantinewpm comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT milanafrancesco comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT rygielagnieszkam comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT sondermeijercarinemt comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT spekcarnold comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT bergmanjacquesjghm comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT peppelenboschmaikelp comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT krishnadathkausiliak comparativeanalysisbysageofgeneexpressionprofilesofesophagealadenocarcinomaandesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma |