Cargando…

Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer

Background: The clinical outcome for the individual prostate cancer patient is often difficult to predict, due to lack of reliable independent prognostic biomarkers. We tested DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor for clinical outcome in 186 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods: DNA ploi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pretorius, Maria E., Wæhre, Håkon, Abeler, Vera M., Davidson, Ben, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Lothe, Ragnhild A., Giercksky, Karl-Erik, Danielsen, Håvard E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19633362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CLO-2009-0463
_version_ 1782397016773492736
author Pretorius, Maria E.
Wæhre, Håkon
Abeler, Vera M.
Davidson, Ben
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Lothe, Ragnhild A.
Giercksky, Karl-Erik
Danielsen, Håvard E.
author_facet Pretorius, Maria E.
Wæhre, Håkon
Abeler, Vera M.
Davidson, Ben
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Lothe, Ragnhild A.
Giercksky, Karl-Erik
Danielsen, Håvard E.
author_sort Pretorius, Maria E.
collection PubMed
description Background: The clinical outcome for the individual prostate cancer patient is often difficult to predict, due to lack of reliable independent prognostic biomarkers. We tested DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor for clinical outcome in 186 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods: DNA ploidy was measured using an automatic image cytometry system and correlated with preoperative PSA, age at surgery, Mostofi grade, surgical margins and Gleason score. Results: The mean follow up time after operation was 73.3 months (range 2–176 months). Of the 186 prostatectomies, 96 were identified as diploid, 61 as tetraploid and 29 as aneuploid. Twenty-three per cent, 36% and 62% of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid cases respectively, suffered from relapse during the observation time. DNA ploidy, Gleason score, Mostofi grading, surgical margins and preoperative PSA were all significant predictors of relapse in a univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only Gleason score and DNA ploidy proved to be independently predictors of disease recurrence. Furthermore, among the 68 cases identified with Gleason score 7, DNA ploidy was the only significant predictor of disease recurrence. Conclusion: Our data suggest that DNA ploidy should be included as an important additive prognostic factor for prostate cancer, especially for patients identified with Gleason score 7 tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4618993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46189932016-01-12 Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer Pretorius, Maria E. Wæhre, Håkon Abeler, Vera M. Davidson, Ben Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Lothe, Ragnhild A. Giercksky, Karl-Erik Danielsen, Håvard E. Cell Oncol Other Background: The clinical outcome for the individual prostate cancer patient is often difficult to predict, due to lack of reliable independent prognostic biomarkers. We tested DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor for clinical outcome in 186 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods: DNA ploidy was measured using an automatic image cytometry system and correlated with preoperative PSA, age at surgery, Mostofi grade, surgical margins and Gleason score. Results: The mean follow up time after operation was 73.3 months (range 2–176 months). Of the 186 prostatectomies, 96 were identified as diploid, 61 as tetraploid and 29 as aneuploid. Twenty-three per cent, 36% and 62% of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid cases respectively, suffered from relapse during the observation time. DNA ploidy, Gleason score, Mostofi grading, surgical margins and preoperative PSA were all significant predictors of relapse in a univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only Gleason score and DNA ploidy proved to be independently predictors of disease recurrence. Furthermore, among the 68 cases identified with Gleason score 7, DNA ploidy was the only significant predictor of disease recurrence. Conclusion: Our data suggest that DNA ploidy should be included as an important additive prognostic factor for prostate cancer, especially for patients identified with Gleason score 7 tumours. IOS Press 2009 2009-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4618993/ /pubmed/19633362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CLO-2009-0463 Text en Copyright © 2009 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Pretorius, Maria E.
Wæhre, Håkon
Abeler, Vera M.
Davidson, Ben
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Lothe, Ragnhild A.
Giercksky, Karl-Erik
Danielsen, Håvard E.
Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title_full Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title_short Large Scale Genomic Instability as an Additive Prognostic Marker in Early Prostate Cancer
title_sort large scale genomic instability as an additive prognostic marker in early prostate cancer
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19633362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CLO-2009-0463
work_keys_str_mv AT pretoriusmariae largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT wæhrehakon largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT abelerveram largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT davidsonben largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT vlatkovicljiljana largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT lotheragnhilda largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT gierckskykarlerik largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer
AT danielsenhavarde largescalegenomicinstabilityasanadditiveprognosticmarkerinearlyprostatecancer