Cargando…

Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra

Understanding why animal societies take on the form that they do has benefited from insights gained by applying social network analysis to patterns of individual associations. Such analyses typically aggregate data over long time periods even though most selective forces that shape sociality have st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubenstein, Daniel I., Sundaresan, Siva R., Fischhoff, Ilya R., Tantipathananandh, Chayant, Berger-Wolf, Tanya Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138645
_version_ 1782397037920124928
author Rubenstein, Daniel I.
Sundaresan, Siva R.
Fischhoff, Ilya R.
Tantipathananandh, Chayant
Berger-Wolf, Tanya Y.
author_facet Rubenstein, Daniel I.
Sundaresan, Siva R.
Fischhoff, Ilya R.
Tantipathananandh, Chayant
Berger-Wolf, Tanya Y.
author_sort Rubenstein, Daniel I.
collection PubMed
description Understanding why animal societies take on the form that they do has benefited from insights gained by applying social network analysis to patterns of individual associations. Such analyses typically aggregate data over long time periods even though most selective forces that shape sociality have strong temporal elements. By explicitly incorporating the temporal signal in social interaction data we re-examine the network dynamics of the social systems of the evolutionarily closely-related Grevy’s zebras and wild asses that show broadly similar social organizations. By identifying dynamic communities, previously hidden differences emerge: Grevy’s zebras show more modularity than wild asses and in wild asses most communities consist of solitary individuals; and in Grevy’s zebras, lactating females show a greater propensity to switch communities than non-lactating females and males. Both patterns were missed by static network analyses and in general, adding a temporal dimension provides insights into differences associated with the size and persistence of communities as well as the frequency and synchrony of their formation. Dynamic network analysis provides insights into the functional significance of these social differences and highlights the way dynamic community analysis can be applied to other species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46190872015-10-29 Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra Rubenstein, Daniel I. Sundaresan, Siva R. Fischhoff, Ilya R. Tantipathananandh, Chayant Berger-Wolf, Tanya Y. PLoS One Research Article Understanding why animal societies take on the form that they do has benefited from insights gained by applying social network analysis to patterns of individual associations. Such analyses typically aggregate data over long time periods even though most selective forces that shape sociality have strong temporal elements. By explicitly incorporating the temporal signal in social interaction data we re-examine the network dynamics of the social systems of the evolutionarily closely-related Grevy’s zebras and wild asses that show broadly similar social organizations. By identifying dynamic communities, previously hidden differences emerge: Grevy’s zebras show more modularity than wild asses and in wild asses most communities consist of solitary individuals; and in Grevy’s zebras, lactating females show a greater propensity to switch communities than non-lactating females and males. Both patterns were missed by static network analyses and in general, adding a temporal dimension provides insights into differences associated with the size and persistence of communities as well as the frequency and synchrony of their formation. Dynamic network analysis provides insights into the functional significance of these social differences and highlights the way dynamic community analysis can be applied to other species. Public Library of Science 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4619087/ /pubmed/26488598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138645 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rubenstein, Daniel I.
Sundaresan, Siva R.
Fischhoff, Ilya R.
Tantipathananandh, Chayant
Berger-Wolf, Tanya Y.
Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title_full Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title_fullStr Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title_full_unstemmed Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title_short Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy’s Zebra
title_sort similar but different: dynamic social network analysis highlights fundamental differences between the fission-fusion societies of two equid species, the onager and grevy’s zebra
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138645
work_keys_str_mv AT rubensteindanieli similarbutdifferentdynamicsocialnetworkanalysishighlightsfundamentaldifferencesbetweenthefissionfusionsocietiesoftwoequidspeciestheonagerandgrevyszebra
AT sundaresansivar similarbutdifferentdynamicsocialnetworkanalysishighlightsfundamentaldifferencesbetweenthefissionfusionsocietiesoftwoequidspeciestheonagerandgrevyszebra
AT fischhoffilyar similarbutdifferentdynamicsocialnetworkanalysishighlightsfundamentaldifferencesbetweenthefissionfusionsocietiesoftwoequidspeciestheonagerandgrevyszebra
AT tantipathananandhchayant similarbutdifferentdynamicsocialnetworkanalysishighlightsfundamentaldifferencesbetweenthefissionfusionsocietiesoftwoequidspeciestheonagerandgrevyszebra
AT bergerwolftanyay similarbutdifferentdynamicsocialnetworkanalysishighlightsfundamentaldifferencesbetweenthefissionfusionsocietiesoftwoequidspeciestheonagerandgrevyszebra