Cargando…
The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no?
BACKGROUND: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are benign lesions in the liver. Although liver resection is generally not indicated in these patients, rare indications for surgical approaches indeed exist. We here report on our single-center experience with patients undergoing liver resection for FNH,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0181-x |
_version_ | 1782397050604748800 |
---|---|
author | Hau, Hans Michael Atanasov, Georgi Tautenhahn, Hans-Michael Ascherl, Rudolf Wiltberger, Georg Schoenberg, Markus Bo Morgül, Mehmet Haluk Uhlmann, Dirk Moche, Michael Fuchs, Jochen Schmelzle, Moritz Bartels, Michael |
author_facet | Hau, Hans Michael Atanasov, Georgi Tautenhahn, Hans-Michael Ascherl, Rudolf Wiltberger, Georg Schoenberg, Markus Bo Morgül, Mehmet Haluk Uhlmann, Dirk Moche, Michael Fuchs, Jochen Schmelzle, Moritz Bartels, Michael |
author_sort | Hau, Hans Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are benign lesions in the liver. Although liver resection is generally not indicated in these patients, rare indications for surgical approaches indeed exist. We here report on our single-center experience with patients undergoing liver resection for FNH, focussing on preoperative diagnostic algorithms and quality of life (QoL) after surgery. METHODS: Medical records of 100 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for FNH between 1992 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to diagnostic pathways and indications for surgery. Quality of life (QoL) before and after surgery was evaluated using validated assessment tools. Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA, χ(2), and binary logistic regression analyses such as Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test were used, as indicated. RESULTS: A combination of at least two preoperative diagnostic imaging approaches was applied in 99 cases, of which 70 patients were subjected to further imaging or tumor biopsy. In most patients, there was more than one indication for liver resection, including tumor-associated symptoms with abdominal discomfort (n = 46, 40.7 %), balance of risk for malignancy/history of cancer (n = 54, 47.8 %/n = 18; 33.3 %), tumor enlargement/jaundice of vascular and biliary structures (n = 13, 11.5 %), such as incidental findings during elective operation (n = 1, 0.9 %). Postoperative morbidity was 19 %, with serious complications (>grade 2, Clavien–Dindo classification) being evident in 8 %. Perioperative mortality was 0 %. Liver resection was associated with a significant overall improvement in general health (very good–excellent: preoperatively 47.4 % vs. postoperatively 68.1 %; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection remains a valuable therapeutic option in the treatment of either symptomatic FNH or if malignancy cannot finally be ruled out. If clinically indicated, liver resection for FNH represents a safe approach and may lead to significant improvements of QoL especially in symptomatic patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40001-015-0181-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4619214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46192142015-10-26 The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? Hau, Hans Michael Atanasov, Georgi Tautenhahn, Hans-Michael Ascherl, Rudolf Wiltberger, Georg Schoenberg, Markus Bo Morgül, Mehmet Haluk Uhlmann, Dirk Moche, Michael Fuchs, Jochen Schmelzle, Moritz Bartels, Michael Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are benign lesions in the liver. Although liver resection is generally not indicated in these patients, rare indications for surgical approaches indeed exist. We here report on our single-center experience with patients undergoing liver resection for FNH, focussing on preoperative diagnostic algorithms and quality of life (QoL) after surgery. METHODS: Medical records of 100 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for FNH between 1992 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to diagnostic pathways and indications for surgery. Quality of life (QoL) before and after surgery was evaluated using validated assessment tools. Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA, χ(2), and binary logistic regression analyses such as Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test were used, as indicated. RESULTS: A combination of at least two preoperative diagnostic imaging approaches was applied in 99 cases, of which 70 patients were subjected to further imaging or tumor biopsy. In most patients, there was more than one indication for liver resection, including tumor-associated symptoms with abdominal discomfort (n = 46, 40.7 %), balance of risk for malignancy/history of cancer (n = 54, 47.8 %/n = 18; 33.3 %), tumor enlargement/jaundice of vascular and biliary structures (n = 13, 11.5 %), such as incidental findings during elective operation (n = 1, 0.9 %). Postoperative morbidity was 19 %, with serious complications (>grade 2, Clavien–Dindo classification) being evident in 8 %. Perioperative mortality was 0 %. Liver resection was associated with a significant overall improvement in general health (very good–excellent: preoperatively 47.4 % vs. postoperatively 68.1 %; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection remains a valuable therapeutic option in the treatment of either symptomatic FNH or if malignancy cannot finally be ruled out. If clinically indicated, liver resection for FNH represents a safe approach and may lead to significant improvements of QoL especially in symptomatic patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40001-015-0181-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4619214/ /pubmed/26494164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0181-x Text en © Hau et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hau, Hans Michael Atanasov, Georgi Tautenhahn, Hans-Michael Ascherl, Rudolf Wiltberger, Georg Schoenberg, Markus Bo Morgül, Mehmet Haluk Uhlmann, Dirk Moche, Michael Fuchs, Jochen Schmelzle, Moritz Bartels, Michael The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title | The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title_full | The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title_fullStr | The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title_short | The value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
title_sort | value of liver resection for focal nodular hyperplasia: resection yes or no? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0181-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hauhansmichael thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT atanasovgeorgi thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT tautenhahnhansmichael thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT ascherlrudolf thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT wiltbergergeorg thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT schoenbergmarkusbo thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT morgulmehmethaluk thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT uhlmanndirk thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT mochemichael thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT fuchsjochen thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT schmelzlemoritz thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT bartelsmichael thevalueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT hauhansmichael valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT atanasovgeorgi valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT tautenhahnhansmichael valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT ascherlrudolf valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT wiltbergergeorg valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT schoenbergmarkusbo valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT morgulmehmethaluk valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT uhlmanndirk valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT mochemichael valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT fuchsjochen valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT schmelzlemoritz valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno AT bartelsmichael valueofliverresectionforfocalnodularhyperplasiaresectionyesorno |