Cargando…

Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Brigida Costa, Marques, Rui Vale, Khouri, Leila, Santos, Tânia, Sá-Couto, Pedro, do Carmo Lopes, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the CT images taken during patient follow-up and deformable registration was used to transfer this volume into the planning CT. The methods used to classify recurrences were: method CTV quantified the intersection volume between the recurrence and the Clinical Target Volume (CTV); method TV quantified the intersection between the Treated Volume and the recurrence (for method CTV and TV, recurrences were classified in-field if more than 95% of their volume were inside the volume of interest, marginal if the intersection was between 20-95% and outfield otherwise); and method COM was based on the position of the Centre Of Mass of the recurrence. A dose assessment in the recurrence volume was also made. RESULTS: The 2-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence incidence was 10%. Tumour recurrences occurred in 22 patients in a mean time of 16.5 ± 9.4 months resulting in 28 recurrence volumes. The percentage of in-field recurrences for methods CTV, TV and COM was 7%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Agreement between the three methods in characterizing individually in-field and marginal recurrences was found only in six cases. Methods CTV and COM agreed in 14. The percentage of outfield recurrences was 29% using all methods. For local recurrences (in-field or marginal to gross disease) the average difference between the prescribed dose and D(98%) in the recurrence volume was -5.2 ± 3.5% (range: -10.1%-0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The classification of in-field and marginal recurrences is very dependent on the method used to characterize recurrences. Using methods TV and COM the largest percentage of tumour recurrences occurred in-field in tissues irradiated with high doses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.