Cargando…

Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of a tissue expander (hydrogel) for sparing of the rectum from increased irradiation during prostate radiotherapy is becoming popular. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of a tissue expander (hydrogel) on the intrafraction prostate motion during radio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juneja, Prabhjot, Kneebone, Andrew, Booth, Jeremy T., Thwaites, David I., Kaur, Ramandeep, Colvill, Emma, Ng, Jin A., Keall, Paul J., Eade, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0526-1
_version_ 1782397069093240832
author Juneja, Prabhjot
Kneebone, Andrew
Booth, Jeremy T.
Thwaites, David I.
Kaur, Ramandeep
Colvill, Emma
Ng, Jin A.
Keall, Paul J.
Eade, Thomas
author_facet Juneja, Prabhjot
Kneebone, Andrew
Booth, Jeremy T.
Thwaites, David I.
Kaur, Ramandeep
Colvill, Emma
Ng, Jin A.
Keall, Paul J.
Eade, Thomas
author_sort Juneja, Prabhjot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of a tissue expander (hydrogel) for sparing of the rectum from increased irradiation during prostate radiotherapy is becoming popular. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of a tissue expander (hydrogel) on the intrafraction prostate motion during radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Real time prostate motion was analysed for 26 patients and 742 fractions; 12 patients with and 14 patients without hydrogel (SpaceOAR™). The intra-fraction motion was quantified and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average (±standard deviation) of the mean motion during the treatment for patients with and without hydrogel was 1.5 (±0.8 mm) and 1.1 (±0.9 mm) respectively (p < 0.05). The average time of motion >3 mm for patients with and without hydrogel was 7.7 % (±1.1 %) and 4.5 % (±0.9 %) respectively (p > 0.05). The hydrogel age, fraction number and treatment time were found to have no effect (R(2) < 0.05) on the prostate motion. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in intrafraction motion in patients with hydrogel and without hydrogel were within measurement uncertainty (<1 mm). This result confirms that the addition of a spacer does not negate the need for intrafraction motion management if clinically indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46192942015-10-26 Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study Juneja, Prabhjot Kneebone, Andrew Booth, Jeremy T. Thwaites, David I. Kaur, Ramandeep Colvill, Emma Ng, Jin A. Keall, Paul J. Eade, Thomas Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of a tissue expander (hydrogel) for sparing of the rectum from increased irradiation during prostate radiotherapy is becoming popular. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of a tissue expander (hydrogel) on the intrafraction prostate motion during radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Real time prostate motion was analysed for 26 patients and 742 fractions; 12 patients with and 14 patients without hydrogel (SpaceOAR™). The intra-fraction motion was quantified and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average (±standard deviation) of the mean motion during the treatment for patients with and without hydrogel was 1.5 (±0.8 mm) and 1.1 (±0.9 mm) respectively (p < 0.05). The average time of motion >3 mm for patients with and without hydrogel was 7.7 % (±1.1 %) and 4.5 % (±0.9 %) respectively (p > 0.05). The hydrogel age, fraction number and treatment time were found to have no effect (R(2) < 0.05) on the prostate motion. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in intrafraction motion in patients with hydrogel and without hydrogel were within measurement uncertainty (<1 mm). This result confirms that the addition of a spacer does not negate the need for intrafraction motion management if clinically indicated. BioMed Central 2015-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4619294/ /pubmed/26499473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0526-1 Text en © Juneja et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Juneja, Prabhjot
Kneebone, Andrew
Booth, Jeremy T.
Thwaites, David I.
Kaur, Ramandeep
Colvill, Emma
Ng, Jin A.
Keall, Paul J.
Eade, Thomas
Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title_full Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title_fullStr Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title_short Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
title_sort prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0526-1
work_keys_str_mv AT junejaprabhjot prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT kneeboneandrew prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT boothjeremyt prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT thwaitesdavidi prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT kaurramandeep prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT colvillemma prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT ngjina prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT keallpaulj prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy
AT eadethomas prostatemotionduringradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientswithandwithoutapplicationofahydrogelspaceracomparativestudy