Cargando…

Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component

We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehravari, Alison S., Tanner, Darren, Wampler, Emma K., Valentine, Geoffrey D., Osterhout, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850
_version_ 1782397069549371392
author Mehravari, Alison S.
Tanner, Darren
Wampler, Emma K.
Valentine, Geoffrey D.
Osterhout, Lee
author_facet Mehravari, Alison S.
Tanner, Darren
Wampler, Emma K.
Valentine, Geoffrey D.
Osterhout, Lee
author_sort Mehravari, Alison S.
collection PubMed
description We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-related potential component. Participants read sentences that were either well-formed or grammatically ill-formed, in which the critical word was either morphologically simple or complex. Results revealed no effects of complexity for well-formed stimuli, but the P600 amplitude was significantly larger for morphologically complex ungrammatical stimuli than for morphologically simple ungrammatical stimuli. These findings suggest that some previous work may have inadequately characterized factors related to reanalysis during morphosyntactic processing. Our results show that morphological complexity by itself does not elicit P600 effects. However, in ungrammatical circumstances, overt morphology provides a more robust and reliable cue to morphosyntactic relationships than null affixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46192962015-10-29 Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component Mehravari, Alison S. Tanner, Darren Wampler, Emma K. Valentine, Geoffrey D. Osterhout, Lee PLoS One Research Article We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-related potential component. Participants read sentences that were either well-formed or grammatically ill-formed, in which the critical word was either morphologically simple or complex. Results revealed no effects of complexity for well-formed stimuli, but the P600 amplitude was significantly larger for morphologically complex ungrammatical stimuli than for morphologically simple ungrammatical stimuli. These findings suggest that some previous work may have inadequately characterized factors related to reanalysis during morphosyntactic processing. Our results show that morphological complexity by itself does not elicit P600 effects. However, in ungrammatical circumstances, overt morphology provides a more robust and reliable cue to morphosyntactic relationships than null affixation. Public Library of Science 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4619296/ /pubmed/26488893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850 Text en © 2015 Mehravari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehravari, Alison S.
Tanner, Darren
Wampler, Emma K.
Valentine, Geoffrey D.
Osterhout, Lee
Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title_full Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title_fullStr Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title_short Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
title_sort effects of grammaticality and morphological complexity on the p600 event-related potential component
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850
work_keys_str_mv AT mehravarialisons effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent
AT tannerdarren effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent
AT wampleremmak effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent
AT valentinegeoffreyd effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent
AT osterhoutlee effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent