Cargando…
Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component
We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850 |
_version_ | 1782397069549371392 |
---|---|
author | Mehravari, Alison S. Tanner, Darren Wampler, Emma K. Valentine, Geoffrey D. Osterhout, Lee |
author_facet | Mehravari, Alison S. Tanner, Darren Wampler, Emma K. Valentine, Geoffrey D. Osterhout, Lee |
author_sort | Mehravari, Alison S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-related potential component. Participants read sentences that were either well-formed or grammatically ill-formed, in which the critical word was either morphologically simple or complex. Results revealed no effects of complexity for well-formed stimuli, but the P600 amplitude was significantly larger for morphologically complex ungrammatical stimuli than for morphologically simple ungrammatical stimuli. These findings suggest that some previous work may have inadequately characterized factors related to reanalysis during morphosyntactic processing. Our results show that morphological complexity by itself does not elicit P600 effects. However, in ungrammatical circumstances, overt morphology provides a more robust and reliable cue to morphosyntactic relationships than null affixation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4619296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46192962015-10-29 Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component Mehravari, Alison S. Tanner, Darren Wampler, Emma K. Valentine, Geoffrey D. Osterhout, Lee PLoS One Research Article We investigated interactions between morphological complexity and grammaticality on electrophysiological markers of grammatical processing during reading. Our goal was to determine whether morphological complexity and stimulus grammaticality have independent or additive effects on the P600 event-related potential component. Participants read sentences that were either well-formed or grammatically ill-formed, in which the critical word was either morphologically simple or complex. Results revealed no effects of complexity for well-formed stimuli, but the P600 amplitude was significantly larger for morphologically complex ungrammatical stimuli than for morphologically simple ungrammatical stimuli. These findings suggest that some previous work may have inadequately characterized factors related to reanalysis during morphosyntactic processing. Our results show that morphological complexity by itself does not elicit P600 effects. However, in ungrammatical circumstances, overt morphology provides a more robust and reliable cue to morphosyntactic relationships than null affixation. Public Library of Science 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4619296/ /pubmed/26488893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850 Text en © 2015 Mehravari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mehravari, Alison S. Tanner, Darren Wampler, Emma K. Valentine, Geoffrey D. Osterhout, Lee Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title | Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title_full | Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title_fullStr | Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title_short | Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component |
title_sort | effects of grammaticality and morphological complexity on the p600 event-related potential component |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehravarialisons effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent AT tannerdarren effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent AT wampleremmak effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent AT valentinegeoffreyd effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent AT osterhoutlee effectsofgrammaticalityandmorphologicalcomplexityonthep600eventrelatedpotentialcomponent |