Cargando…

Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study

BACKGROUND: Patients after primary hip or knee replacement surgery can benefit from postoperative treatment in terms of improvement of independence in ambulation, transfers, range of motion and muscle strength. After discharge from hospital, patients are referred to different treatment destination a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benz, T., Angst, F., Oesch, P., Hilfiker, R., Lehmann, S., Mueller Mebes, C., Kramer, E., Verra, ML
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0780-2
_version_ 1782397098080075776
author Benz, T.
Angst, F.
Oesch, P.
Hilfiker, R.
Lehmann, S.
Mueller Mebes, C.
Kramer, E.
Verra, ML
author_facet Benz, T.
Angst, F.
Oesch, P.
Hilfiker, R.
Lehmann, S.
Mueller Mebes, C.
Kramer, E.
Verra, ML
author_sort Benz, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients after primary hip or knee replacement surgery can benefit from postoperative treatment in terms of improvement of independence in ambulation, transfers, range of motion and muscle strength. After discharge from hospital, patients are referred to different treatment destination and modalities: intensive inpatient rehabilitation (IR), cure (medically prescribed stay at a convalescence center), or ambulatory treatment (AT) at home. The purpose of this study was to 1) measure functional health (primary outcome) and function relevant factors in patients with hip or knee arthroplasty and to compare them in relation to three postoperative management strategies: AT, Cure and IR and 2) compare the post-operative changes in patient’s health status (between preoperative and the 6 month follow-up) for three rehabilitation settings. METHODS: Natural observational, prospective two-center study with follow-up. Sociodemographic data and functional mobility tests, Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILOAS) of 201 patients were analysed before arthroplasty and at the end of acute hospital stay (mean duration of stay: 9.7 days +/− 3.9). Changes in health state were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) before and 6 months after arthroplasty. RESULTS: Compared to patients referred for IR and Cure, patients referred for AT were significantly younger and less comorbid. Patients admitted to IR had the highest functional disability before arthroplasty. Before rehabilitation, mean TUG was 40.0 s in the IR group, 33.9 s in the Cure group, and 27.5 s in the AT group, and corresponding mean ILOAS was 16.0, 13.0 and 12.2 (50.0 = worst). At the 6 months follow-up, the corresponding effect sizes of the WOMAC global score were 1.32, 1.87, and 1.51 (>0 means improvement). CONCLUSIONS: Age, comorbidity and functional disability are associated with referral for intensive inpatient rehabilitation after hip or knee arthroplasty and partly affect health changes after rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46194182015-10-26 Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study Benz, T. Angst, F. Oesch, P. Hilfiker, R. Lehmann, S. Mueller Mebes, C. Kramer, E. Verra, ML BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients after primary hip or knee replacement surgery can benefit from postoperative treatment in terms of improvement of independence in ambulation, transfers, range of motion and muscle strength. After discharge from hospital, patients are referred to different treatment destination and modalities: intensive inpatient rehabilitation (IR), cure (medically prescribed stay at a convalescence center), or ambulatory treatment (AT) at home. The purpose of this study was to 1) measure functional health (primary outcome) and function relevant factors in patients with hip or knee arthroplasty and to compare them in relation to three postoperative management strategies: AT, Cure and IR and 2) compare the post-operative changes in patient’s health status (between preoperative and the 6 month follow-up) for three rehabilitation settings. METHODS: Natural observational, prospective two-center study with follow-up. Sociodemographic data and functional mobility tests, Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILOAS) of 201 patients were analysed before arthroplasty and at the end of acute hospital stay (mean duration of stay: 9.7 days +/− 3.9). Changes in health state were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) before and 6 months after arthroplasty. RESULTS: Compared to patients referred for IR and Cure, patients referred for AT were significantly younger and less comorbid. Patients admitted to IR had the highest functional disability before arthroplasty. Before rehabilitation, mean TUG was 40.0 s in the IR group, 33.9 s in the Cure group, and 27.5 s in the AT group, and corresponding mean ILOAS was 16.0, 13.0 and 12.2 (50.0 = worst). At the 6 months follow-up, the corresponding effect sizes of the WOMAC global score were 1.32, 1.87, and 1.51 (>0 means improvement). CONCLUSIONS: Age, comorbidity and functional disability are associated with referral for intensive inpatient rehabilitation after hip or knee arthroplasty and partly affect health changes after rehabilitation. BioMed Central 2015-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4619418/ /pubmed/26497597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0780-2 Text en © Benz et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benz, T.
Angst, F.
Oesch, P.
Hilfiker, R.
Lehmann, S.
Mueller Mebes, C.
Kramer, E.
Verra, ML
Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title_full Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title_short Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
title_sort comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0780-2
work_keys_str_mv AT benzt comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT angstf comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT oeschp comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT hilfikerr comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT lehmanns comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT muellermebesc comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT kramere comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy
AT verraml comparisonofpatientsinthreedifferentrehabilitationsettingsafterkneeorhiparthroplastyanaturalobservationalprospectivestudy