Cargando…

Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria

BACKGROUND: Health policymaking is a complex process and analysing the role of evidence is still an evolving area in many low- and middle-income countries. Where evidence is used, it is greatly affected by cognitive and institutional features of the policy process. This paper examines the role of di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onwujekwe, Obinna, Uguru, Nkoli, Russo, Giuliano, Etiaba, Enyi, Mbachu, Chinyere, Mirzoev, Tolib, Uzochukwu, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0049-0
_version_ 1782397103471853568
author Onwujekwe, Obinna
Uguru, Nkoli
Russo, Giuliano
Etiaba, Enyi
Mbachu, Chinyere
Mirzoev, Tolib
Uzochukwu, Benjamin
author_facet Onwujekwe, Obinna
Uguru, Nkoli
Russo, Giuliano
Etiaba, Enyi
Mbachu, Chinyere
Mirzoev, Tolib
Uzochukwu, Benjamin
author_sort Onwujekwe, Obinna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health policymaking is a complex process and analysing the role of evidence is still an evolving area in many low- and middle-income countries. Where evidence is used, it is greatly affected by cognitive and institutional features of the policy process. This paper examines the role of different types of evidence in health policy development in Nigeria. METHODS: The role of evidence was compared between three case studies representing different health policies, namely the (1) integrated maternal neonatal and child health strategy (IMNCH); (2) oral health (OH) policy; and (3) human resource for health (HRH) policy. The data was collected using document reviews and 31 in-depth interviews with key policy actors. Framework Approach was used to analyse the data, aided by NVivo 10 software. RESULTS: Most respondents perceived evidence to be factual and concrete to support a decision. Evidence was used more if it was perceived to be context-specific, accessible and timely. Low-cost high-impact evidence, such as the Lancet series, was reported to have been used in drafting the IMNCH policy. In the OH and HRH policies, informal evidence such as experts’ experiences and opinions, were reported to have been useful in the policy drafting stage. Both formal and informal evidence were mentioned in the HRH and OH policies, while the development of the IMNCH was revealed to have been informed mainly by more formal evidence. Overall, respondents suggested that formal evidence, such as survey reports and research publications, were most useful in the agenda-setting stage to identify the need for the policy and thus initiating the policy development process. International and local evidence were used to establish the need for a policy and develop policy, and less to develop policy implementation options. CONCLUSION: Recognition of the value of different evidence types, combined with structures for generating and using evidence, are likely to enhance evidence-informed health policy development in Nigeria and other similar contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46194412015-10-26 Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria Onwujekwe, Obinna Uguru, Nkoli Russo, Giuliano Etiaba, Enyi Mbachu, Chinyere Mirzoev, Tolib Uzochukwu, Benjamin Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Health policymaking is a complex process and analysing the role of evidence is still an evolving area in many low- and middle-income countries. Where evidence is used, it is greatly affected by cognitive and institutional features of the policy process. This paper examines the role of different types of evidence in health policy development in Nigeria. METHODS: The role of evidence was compared between three case studies representing different health policies, namely the (1) integrated maternal neonatal and child health strategy (IMNCH); (2) oral health (OH) policy; and (3) human resource for health (HRH) policy. The data was collected using document reviews and 31 in-depth interviews with key policy actors. Framework Approach was used to analyse the data, aided by NVivo 10 software. RESULTS: Most respondents perceived evidence to be factual and concrete to support a decision. Evidence was used more if it was perceived to be context-specific, accessible and timely. Low-cost high-impact evidence, such as the Lancet series, was reported to have been used in drafting the IMNCH policy. In the OH and HRH policies, informal evidence such as experts’ experiences and opinions, were reported to have been useful in the policy drafting stage. Both formal and informal evidence were mentioned in the HRH and OH policies, while the development of the IMNCH was revealed to have been informed mainly by more formal evidence. Overall, respondents suggested that formal evidence, such as survey reports and research publications, were most useful in the agenda-setting stage to identify the need for the policy and thus initiating the policy development process. International and local evidence were used to establish the need for a policy and develop policy, and less to develop policy implementation options. CONCLUSION: Recognition of the value of different evidence types, combined with structures for generating and using evidence, are likely to enhance evidence-informed health policy development in Nigeria and other similar contexts. BioMed Central 2015-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4619441/ /pubmed/26499950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0049-0 Text en © Onwujekwe et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Onwujekwe, Obinna
Uguru, Nkoli
Russo, Giuliano
Etiaba, Enyi
Mbachu, Chinyere
Mirzoev, Tolib
Uzochukwu, Benjamin
Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title_full Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title_fullStr Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title_short Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria
title_sort role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in nigeria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0049-0
work_keys_str_mv AT onwujekweobinna roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT ugurunkoli roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT russogiuliano roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT etiabaenyi roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT mbachuchinyere roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT mirzoevtolib roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria
AT uzochukwubenjamin roleanduseofevidenceinpolicymakingananalysisofcasestudiesfromthehealthsectorinnigeria