Cargando…

Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR

Background. The conduct of clinical trials is increasingly challenging due to greater complexity and governance requirements as well as difficulties with recruitment and retention. Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) aims at improving the conduct of trials by using existing rout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCowan, Colin, Thomson, Elizabeth, Szmigielski, Cezary A., Kalra, Dipak, Sullivan, Frank M., Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich, Dugas, Martin, Ford, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/707891
_version_ 1782397203586744320
author McCowan, Colin
Thomson, Elizabeth
Szmigielski, Cezary A.
Kalra, Dipak
Sullivan, Frank M.
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Dugas, Martin
Ford, Ian
author_facet McCowan, Colin
Thomson, Elizabeth
Szmigielski, Cezary A.
Kalra, Dipak
Sullivan, Frank M.
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Dugas, Martin
Ford, Ian
author_sort McCowan, Colin
collection PubMed
description Background. The conduct of clinical trials is increasingly challenging due to greater complexity and governance requirements as well as difficulties with recruitment and retention. Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) aims at improving the conduct of trials by using existing routinely collected data, but little is known about stakeholder views on data availability, information governance, and acceptable working practices. Methods. Senior figures in healthcare organisations across Europe were provided with a description of the project and structured interviews were subsequently conducted to elicit their views. Results. 37 structured interviewees in Germany, UK, Switzerland, and France indicated strong support for the proposed EHR4CR platform. All interviewees reported that using the platform for assessing feasibility would enhance the conduct of clinical trials and the majority also felt it would reduce workloads. Interviewees felt the platform could enhance trial recruitment and adverse event reporting but also felt it could raise either ethical or information governance concerns in their country. Conclusions. There was clear support for EHR4CR and a belief that it could reduce workloads and improve the conduct and quality of trials. However data security, privacy, and information governance issues would need to be carefully managed in the development of the platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46198772015-11-04 Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR McCowan, Colin Thomson, Elizabeth Szmigielski, Cezary A. Kalra, Dipak Sullivan, Frank M. Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich Dugas, Martin Ford, Ian Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. The conduct of clinical trials is increasingly challenging due to greater complexity and governance requirements as well as difficulties with recruitment and retention. Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) aims at improving the conduct of trials by using existing routinely collected data, but little is known about stakeholder views on data availability, information governance, and acceptable working practices. Methods. Senior figures in healthcare organisations across Europe were provided with a description of the project and structured interviews were subsequently conducted to elicit their views. Results. 37 structured interviewees in Germany, UK, Switzerland, and France indicated strong support for the proposed EHR4CR platform. All interviewees reported that using the platform for assessing feasibility would enhance the conduct of clinical trials and the majority also felt it would reduce workloads. Interviewees felt the platform could enhance trial recruitment and adverse event reporting but also felt it could raise either ethical or information governance concerns in their country. Conclusions. There was clear support for EHR4CR and a belief that it could reduce workloads and improve the conduct and quality of trials. However data security, privacy, and information governance issues would need to be carefully managed in the development of the platform. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4619877/ /pubmed/26539523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/707891 Text en Copyright © 2015 Colin McCowan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCowan, Colin
Thomson, Elizabeth
Szmigielski, Cezary A.
Kalra, Dipak
Sullivan, Frank M.
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Dugas, Martin
Ford, Ian
Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title_full Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title_fullStr Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title_full_unstemmed Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title_short Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR
title_sort using electronic health records to support clinical trials: a report on stakeholder engagement for ehr4cr
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/707891
work_keys_str_mv AT mccowancolin usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT thomsonelizabeth usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT szmigielskicezarya usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT kalradipak usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT sullivanfrankm usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT prokoschhansulrich usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT dugasmartin usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr
AT fordian usingelectronichealthrecordstosupportclinicaltrialsareportonstakeholderengagementforehr4cr