Cargando…
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans
Purpose. To investigate the regenerative results obtained with the association of bone marrow aspirate concentrate using the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) method to a xenogeneic bone graft (Bio-Oss) in sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods. Using a randomized controlled study design...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/121286 |
_version_ | 1782397257666002944 |
---|---|
author | Pasquali, Paulo José Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi de Oliveira, Thiago Altro de Macedo, Luis Guilherme Scavone Aloise, Antonio Carlos Pelegrine, André Antonio |
author_facet | Pasquali, Paulo José Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi de Oliveira, Thiago Altro de Macedo, Luis Guilherme Scavone Aloise, Antonio Carlos Pelegrine, André Antonio |
author_sort | Pasquali, Paulo José |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To investigate the regenerative results obtained with the association of bone marrow aspirate concentrate using the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) method to a xenogeneic bone graft (Bio-Oss) in sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods. Using a randomized controlled study design in eight consecutive patients (age of 55.4 ± 9.2 years), 16 sinus floor lift procedures were performed with Bio-Oss alone (control group, CG, n = 8) or combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate obtained via the BMAC method (test group, TG, n = 8). Six months after the grafting procedures, bone biopsies were harvested during implant placement and were analyzed by histomorphometry. Results. Histomorphometric analysis revealed a significantly higher amount (p < 0.05) of vital mineralized tissue in TG when compared to the CG (55.15 ± 20.91% and 27.30 ± 5.55%, resp.). For nonvital mineralized tissue, TG presented a statistically higher level of Bio-Oss resorption (p < 0.05) when compared with the CG (6.32 ± 12.03% and 22.79 ± 9.60%, resp.). Both groups (TG and CG) showed no significantly different levels (p > 0.05) of nonmineralized tissue (38.53 ± 13.08% and 49.90 ± 7.64%, resp.). Conclusion. The use of bone marrow concentrate obtained by BMAC method increased bone formation in sinus lift procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4620258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46202582015-11-05 Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans Pasquali, Paulo José Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi de Oliveira, Thiago Altro de Macedo, Luis Guilherme Scavone Aloise, Antonio Carlos Pelegrine, André Antonio Int J Biomater Research Article Purpose. To investigate the regenerative results obtained with the association of bone marrow aspirate concentrate using the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) method to a xenogeneic bone graft (Bio-Oss) in sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods. Using a randomized controlled study design in eight consecutive patients (age of 55.4 ± 9.2 years), 16 sinus floor lift procedures were performed with Bio-Oss alone (control group, CG, n = 8) or combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate obtained via the BMAC method (test group, TG, n = 8). Six months after the grafting procedures, bone biopsies were harvested during implant placement and were analyzed by histomorphometry. Results. Histomorphometric analysis revealed a significantly higher amount (p < 0.05) of vital mineralized tissue in TG when compared to the CG (55.15 ± 20.91% and 27.30 ± 5.55%, resp.). For nonvital mineralized tissue, TG presented a statistically higher level of Bio-Oss resorption (p < 0.05) when compared with the CG (6.32 ± 12.03% and 22.79 ± 9.60%, resp.). Both groups (TG and CG) showed no significantly different levels (p > 0.05) of nonmineralized tissue (38.53 ± 13.08% and 49.90 ± 7.64%, resp.). Conclusion. The use of bone marrow concentrate obtained by BMAC method increased bone formation in sinus lift procedures. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4620258/ /pubmed/26543482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/121286 Text en Copyright © 2015 Paulo José Pasquali et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pasquali, Paulo José Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi de Oliveira, Thiago Altro de Macedo, Luis Guilherme Scavone Aloise, Antonio Carlos Pelegrine, André Antonio Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title_full | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title_fullStr | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title_short | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans |
title_sort | maxillary sinus augmentation combining bio-oss with the bone marrow aspirate concentrate: a histomorphometric study in humans |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/121286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasqualipaulojose maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans AT teixeiramarcelolucchesi maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans AT deoliveirathiagoaltro maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans AT demacedoluisguilhermescavone maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans AT aloiseantoniocarlos maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans AT pelegrineandreantonio maxillarysinusaugmentationcombiningbioosswiththebonemarrowaspirateconcentrateahistomorphometricstudyinhumans |