Cargando…

Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seong, Seok Ju, Kim, Da Hee, Kim, Mi Kyoung, Song, Taejong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343
_version_ 1782397283445243904
author Seong, Seok Ju
Kim, Da Hee
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Song, Taejong
author_facet Seong, Seok Ju
Kim, Da Hee
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Song, Taejong
author_sort Seong, Seok Ju
collection PubMed
description Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions; in case of mucinous BOTs, appendectomy should be performed. Because BOTs are often diagnosed at earlier stage, in younger age women and have better prognosis, higher survival rate than IOCs, fertility-sparing surgery is one of the option to preserve childbearing capacity. The study of such conservative surgery is being released, and still controversial. After surgery, pregnancy and ovarian induction followed by in vitro fertilization are also significant issues. In surgery, laparoscopic technique can be used by a gynecologic oncology surgeon. So far postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are not recommended. We will discuss controversial issues of BOTs on this review and present the outline of the management of BOTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4620372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46203722015-10-27 Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors Seong, Seok Ju Kim, Da Hee Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Taejong J Gynecol Oncol Review Article Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions; in case of mucinous BOTs, appendectomy should be performed. Because BOTs are often diagnosed at earlier stage, in younger age women and have better prognosis, higher survival rate than IOCs, fertility-sparing surgery is one of the option to preserve childbearing capacity. The study of such conservative surgery is being released, and still controversial. After surgery, pregnancy and ovarian induction followed by in vitro fertilization are also significant issues. In surgery, laparoscopic technique can be used by a gynecologic oncology surgeon. So far postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are not recommended. We will discuss controversial issues of BOTs on this review and present the outline of the management of BOTs. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015-10 2015-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4620372/ /pubmed/26404125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343 Text en Copyright © 2015. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Seong, Seok Ju
Kim, Da Hee
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Song, Taejong
Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title_full Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title_fullStr Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title_short Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
title_sort controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343
work_keys_str_mv AT seongseokju controversiesinborderlineovariantumors
AT kimdahee controversiesinborderlineovariantumors
AT kimmikyoung controversiesinborderlineovariantumors
AT songtaejong controversiesinborderlineovariantumors