Cargando…
Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete pe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343 |
_version_ | 1782397283445243904 |
---|---|
author | Seong, Seok Ju Kim, Da Hee Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Taejong |
author_facet | Seong, Seok Ju Kim, Da Hee Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Taejong |
author_sort | Seong, Seok Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions; in case of mucinous BOTs, appendectomy should be performed. Because BOTs are often diagnosed at earlier stage, in younger age women and have better prognosis, higher survival rate than IOCs, fertility-sparing surgery is one of the option to preserve childbearing capacity. The study of such conservative surgery is being released, and still controversial. After surgery, pregnancy and ovarian induction followed by in vitro fertilization are also significant issues. In surgery, laparoscopic technique can be used by a gynecologic oncology surgeon. So far postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are not recommended. We will discuss controversial issues of BOTs on this review and present the outline of the management of BOTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4620372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46203722015-10-27 Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors Seong, Seok Ju Kim, Da Hee Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Taejong J Gynecol Oncol Review Article Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions; in case of mucinous BOTs, appendectomy should be performed. Because BOTs are often diagnosed at earlier stage, in younger age women and have better prognosis, higher survival rate than IOCs, fertility-sparing surgery is one of the option to preserve childbearing capacity. The study of such conservative surgery is being released, and still controversial. After surgery, pregnancy and ovarian induction followed by in vitro fertilization are also significant issues. In surgery, laparoscopic technique can be used by a gynecologic oncology surgeon. So far postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are not recommended. We will discuss controversial issues of BOTs on this review and present the outline of the management of BOTs. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015-10 2015-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4620372/ /pubmed/26404125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343 Text en Copyright © 2015. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Seong, Seok Ju Kim, Da Hee Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Taejong Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title | Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title_full | Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title_fullStr | Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title_short | Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
title_sort | controversies in borderline ovarian tumors |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seongseokju controversiesinborderlineovariantumors AT kimdahee controversiesinborderlineovariantumors AT kimmikyoung controversiesinborderlineovariantumors AT songtaejong controversiesinborderlineovariantumors |