Cargando…
Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1 |
_version_ | 1782397332207173632 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jie Li, Juan Thornicroft, Graham Yang, Hui Chen, Wen Huang, Yuanguang |
author_facet | Li, Jie Li, Juan Thornicroft, Graham Yang, Hui Chen, Wen Huang, Yuanguang |
author_sort | Li, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their stigmatization toward people with mental illness. METHODS: A total of 77 community mental health staff from eight regions in Guangzhou in China were recruited for the study.4 regions were randomly allocated to the new training model group, and 4 to the old training model group. Levels of mental health knowledge were measured by purpose-made assessment schedule and by the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Stigma was evaluated by the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS). Evaluation questionnaires were given at the beginning of course, at the end, and at 6 month and at 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: After the training period, the 6-month, and the 12-month, knowledge scores of the intervention group were higher than the control group. At 6-month and 12-month follow-up, means scores of MAKS of the intervention group increased more than the control group (both p < 0.05) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. At 6-month follow-up, means scores of MICA of the intervention group decreased more than that of the control group (p < 0.01). At after-training, at 6-months, and at 12-months, mean scores of RIBS of the intervention group increased more than the control (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional training course and supervision, the new course improved community mental health staff knowledge of mental disorders, improving their attitudes toward people with mental disorder, and increasing their willingness to have contact with people with mental disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4620640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46206402015-10-27 Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model Li, Jie Li, Juan Thornicroft, Graham Yang, Hui Chen, Wen Huang, Yuanguang BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their stigmatization toward people with mental illness. METHODS: A total of 77 community mental health staff from eight regions in Guangzhou in China were recruited for the study.4 regions were randomly allocated to the new training model group, and 4 to the old training model group. Levels of mental health knowledge were measured by purpose-made assessment schedule and by the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Stigma was evaluated by the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS). Evaluation questionnaires were given at the beginning of course, at the end, and at 6 month and at 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: After the training period, the 6-month, and the 12-month, knowledge scores of the intervention group were higher than the control group. At 6-month and 12-month follow-up, means scores of MAKS of the intervention group increased more than the control group (both p < 0.05) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. At 6-month follow-up, means scores of MICA of the intervention group decreased more than that of the control group (p < 0.01). At after-training, at 6-months, and at 12-months, mean scores of RIBS of the intervention group increased more than the control (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional training course and supervision, the new course improved community mental health staff knowledge of mental disorders, improving their attitudes toward people with mental disorder, and increasing their willingness to have contact with people with mental disorder. BioMed Central 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4620640/ /pubmed/26503370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1 Text en © Li et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Jie Li, Juan Thornicroft, Graham Yang, Hui Chen, Wen Huang, Yuanguang Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title | Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title_full | Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title_fullStr | Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title_full_unstemmed | Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title_short | Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
title_sort | training community mental health staff in guangzhou, china: evaluation of the effect of a new training model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijie trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel AT lijuan trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel AT thornicroftgraham trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel AT yanghui trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel AT chenwen trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel AT huangyuanguang trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel |