Cargando…

Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jie, Li, Juan, Thornicroft, Graham, Yang, Hui, Chen, Wen, Huang, Yuanguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1
_version_ 1782397332207173632
author Li, Jie
Li, Juan
Thornicroft, Graham
Yang, Hui
Chen, Wen
Huang, Yuanguang
author_facet Li, Jie
Li, Juan
Thornicroft, Graham
Yang, Hui
Chen, Wen
Huang, Yuanguang
author_sort Li, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their stigmatization toward people with mental illness. METHODS: A total of 77 community mental health staff from eight regions in Guangzhou in China were recruited for the study.4 regions were randomly allocated to the new training model group, and 4 to the old training model group. Levels of mental health knowledge were measured by purpose-made assessment schedule and by the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Stigma was evaluated by the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS). Evaluation questionnaires were given at the beginning of course, at the end, and at 6 month and at 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: After the training period, the 6-month, and the 12-month, knowledge scores of the intervention group were higher than the control group. At 6-month and 12-month follow-up, means scores of MAKS of the intervention group increased more than the control group (both p < 0.05) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. At 6-month follow-up, means scores of MICA of the intervention group decreased more than that of the control group (p < 0.01). At after-training, at 6-months, and at 12-months, mean scores of RIBS of the intervention group increased more than the control (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional training course and supervision, the new course improved community mental health staff knowledge of mental disorders, improving their attitudes toward people with mental disorder, and increasing their willingness to have contact with people with mental disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4620640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46206402015-10-27 Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model Li, Jie Li, Juan Thornicroft, Graham Yang, Hui Chen, Wen Huang, Yuanguang BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people with mental disorders receive services at primary care in China. The aims of this study are to evaluate impact of a new training course and supervision for community mental health staff to enhance their levels of mental health knowledge and to reduce their stigmatization toward people with mental illness. METHODS: A total of 77 community mental health staff from eight regions in Guangzhou in China were recruited for the study.4 regions were randomly allocated to the new training model group, and 4 to the old training model group. Levels of mental health knowledge were measured by purpose-made assessment schedule and by the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Stigma was evaluated by the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS). Evaluation questionnaires were given at the beginning of course, at the end, and at 6 month and at 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: After the training period, the 6-month, and the 12-month, knowledge scores of the intervention group were higher than the control group. At 6-month and 12-month follow-up, means scores of MAKS of the intervention group increased more than the control group (both p < 0.05) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. At 6-month follow-up, means scores of MICA of the intervention group decreased more than that of the control group (p < 0.01). At after-training, at 6-months, and at 12-months, mean scores of RIBS of the intervention group increased more than the control (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) when age, sex, marriage status, title and time were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional training course and supervision, the new course improved community mental health staff knowledge of mental disorders, improving their attitudes toward people with mental disorder, and increasing their willingness to have contact with people with mental disorder. BioMed Central 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4620640/ /pubmed/26503370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1 Text en © Li et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jie
Li, Juan
Thornicroft, Graham
Yang, Hui
Chen, Wen
Huang, Yuanguang
Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title_full Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title_fullStr Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title_full_unstemmed Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title_short Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
title_sort training community mental health staff in guangzhou, china: evaluation of the effect of a new training model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0660-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lijie trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel
AT lijuan trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel
AT thornicroftgraham trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel
AT yanghui trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel
AT chenwen trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel
AT huangyuanguang trainingcommunitymentalhealthstaffinguangzhouchinaevaluationoftheeffectofanewtrainingmodel