Cargando…

Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) added to conventional ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Among 410 patients who underwent SWE before US-guided biopsy from June 2012 to June 2013, 171 patients (mean age: 45.17 ± ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, So Jung, Ko, Kyung Hee, Jung, Hae Kyoung, Kim, Hyerin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26496257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001540
_version_ 1782397362331713536
author Kim, So Jung
Ko, Kyung Hee
Jung, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Hyerin
author_facet Kim, So Jung
Ko, Kyung Hee
Jung, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Hyerin
author_sort Kim, So Jung
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) added to conventional ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Among 410 patients who underwent SWE before US-guided biopsy from June 2012 to June 2013, 171 patients (mean age: 45.17 ± 9.37 years) with 177 small (≤2 cm) breast lesions were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic performances of each quantitative SWE parameters were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Performances of conventional US and US combined to SWE was also compared. Histologic diagnosis was used as a reference standard. Of the 177 lesions, 22 lesions (12.4%) were malignant and 155 (87.6%) were benign. With respect to conventional US, when a cutoff point between category 3 and 4a was used, the A(z) value was 0.915 (100% sensitivity, 36.8% specificity, 18.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predictive value (NPV)). All average quantitative elastography values were significantly higher in malignant lesions compared to benign lesions (P = 0.001). The E(max) value with a cutoff of 87.5 kPa had the highest A(z) value of 0.796 (68.2% sensitivity and 87.1% specificity, 42.9% PPV, and 95.1% NPV). A(z) value of combined data (0.861, 95% CI: 0.801, 0.909) was significantly lower than that of conventional US alone (P = 0.02). By using an E(max) value for downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a lesions to category 3, 76/94 category 4a lesions (80.9%) were downgraded. After downgrading, 5 cancers were missed and the malignancy rate of category 3 lesions increased from 0% (0/55) to 3.8% (5/133) (P = 0.01). In conclusion, combined use of SWE and conventional US increased the specificity by reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies in differential diagnosis of small breast lesions. However, we propose that the application of conservative strategy for downgrading of soft category 4a lesions would be appropriate to minimize false-negative cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4620821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46208212015-10-27 Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer? Kim, So Jung Ko, Kyung Hee Jung, Hae Kyoung Kim, Hyerin Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) added to conventional ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Among 410 patients who underwent SWE before US-guided biopsy from June 2012 to June 2013, 171 patients (mean age: 45.17 ± 9.37 years) with 177 small (≤2 cm) breast lesions were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic performances of each quantitative SWE parameters were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Performances of conventional US and US combined to SWE was also compared. Histologic diagnosis was used as a reference standard. Of the 177 lesions, 22 lesions (12.4%) were malignant and 155 (87.6%) were benign. With respect to conventional US, when a cutoff point between category 3 and 4a was used, the A(z) value was 0.915 (100% sensitivity, 36.8% specificity, 18.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predictive value (NPV)). All average quantitative elastography values were significantly higher in malignant lesions compared to benign lesions (P = 0.001). The E(max) value with a cutoff of 87.5 kPa had the highest A(z) value of 0.796 (68.2% sensitivity and 87.1% specificity, 42.9% PPV, and 95.1% NPV). A(z) value of combined data (0.861, 95% CI: 0.801, 0.909) was significantly lower than that of conventional US alone (P = 0.02). By using an E(max) value for downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a lesions to category 3, 76/94 category 4a lesions (80.9%) were downgraded. After downgrading, 5 cancers were missed and the malignancy rate of category 3 lesions increased from 0% (0/55) to 3.8% (5/133) (P = 0.01). In conclusion, combined use of SWE and conventional US increased the specificity by reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies in differential diagnosis of small breast lesions. However, we propose that the application of conservative strategy for downgrading of soft category 4a lesions would be appropriate to minimize false-negative cases. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4620821/ /pubmed/26496257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001540 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 6800
Kim, So Jung
Ko, Kyung Hee
Jung, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Hyerin
Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title_full Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title_fullStr Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title_short Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
title_sort shear wave elastography: is it a valuable additive method to conventional ultrasound for the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer?
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26496257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001540
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsojung shearwaveelastographyisitavaluableadditivemethodtoconventionalultrasoundforthediagnosisofsmall2cmbreastcancer
AT kokyunghee shearwaveelastographyisitavaluableadditivemethodtoconventionalultrasoundforthediagnosisofsmall2cmbreastcancer
AT junghaekyoung shearwaveelastographyisitavaluableadditivemethodtoconventionalultrasoundforthediagnosisofsmall2cmbreastcancer
AT kimhyerin shearwaveelastographyisitavaluableadditivemethodtoconventionalultrasoundforthediagnosisofsmall2cmbreastcancer