Cargando…

Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rate of the manovacuometry test in children between 4 and 12 years of age. METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving children and adolescents from 4 to 12 years of age, enrolled in three basic education schools. All subjects had the anthropometric and respiratory m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo, Donadio, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.01.008
_version_ 1782397373110026240
author Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo
Donadio, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes
author_facet Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo
Donadio, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes
author_sort Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rate of the manovacuometry test in children between 4 and 12 years of age. METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving children and adolescents from 4 to 12 years of age, enrolled in three basic education schools. All subjects had the anthropometric and respiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure) data measured. Students whose parents did not authorize participation or who did not want to undergo the test were excluded. The test was considered successful when the subject reached acceptability (no air leaks) and reproducibility (variation <10% between the two major maneuvers) criteria established by guidelines. Failure was defined when subjects did not meet the above criteria. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation and the categorical variables in absolute and relative frequency. The comparison between proportions was performed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: We included 196 children and adolescents, mean age of 8.4±2.5 years, 53.1% female. The success rate of the manovacuometry test in children and adolescents evaluated was 92.3%. When comparing the differences between the success rates of preschool children with those children and adolescents of school age, there was a significantly lower success rate in the pre-school (85.1%) group compared to the school group (94.6%) (p=0.032). However, no significant differences (p=0.575) were found when gender comparisons were performed. CONCLUSIONS: The manovacuometry test showed a high success rate in both preschool and school population assessed. Furthermore, the rate of success appears to be related to aging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4620953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46209532015-12-18 Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children? Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo Donadio, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Rev Paul Pediatr Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rate of the manovacuometry test in children between 4 and 12 years of age. METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving children and adolescents from 4 to 12 years of age, enrolled in three basic education schools. All subjects had the anthropometric and respiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure) data measured. Students whose parents did not authorize participation or who did not want to undergo the test were excluded. The test was considered successful when the subject reached acceptability (no air leaks) and reproducibility (variation <10% between the two major maneuvers) criteria established by guidelines. Failure was defined when subjects did not meet the above criteria. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation and the categorical variables in absolute and relative frequency. The comparison between proportions was performed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: We included 196 children and adolescents, mean age of 8.4±2.5 years, 53.1% female. The success rate of the manovacuometry test in children and adolescents evaluated was 92.3%. When comparing the differences between the success rates of preschool children with those children and adolescents of school age, there was a significantly lower success rate in the pre-school (85.1%) group compared to the school group (94.6%) (p=0.032). However, no significant differences (p=0.575) were found when gender comparisons were performed. CONCLUSIONS: The manovacuometry test showed a high success rate in both preschool and school population assessed. Furthermore, the rate of success appears to be related to aging. Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4620953/ /pubmed/26137867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.01.008 Text en © 2015 Associação de Pediatria de São Paulo. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. Todos os direitos reservados. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Heinzmann-Filho, João Paulo
Donadio, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes
Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title_full Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title_fullStr Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title_short Respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
title_sort respiratory muscle strength test: is it realistic in young children?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.01.008
work_keys_str_mv AT heinzmannfilhojoaopaulo respiratorymusclestrengthtestisitrealisticinyoungchildren
AT donadiomarcioviniciusfagundes respiratorymusclestrengthtestisitrealisticinyoungchildren