Cargando…
Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis
OBJECTIVE: To describe the radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of a case report and literature review, diagnostic criteria and clinical significance of megacalycosis are presented. RESULT: Megacalycosis is mostly asymptomatic and is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S81519 |
_version_ | 1782397398351347712 |
---|---|
author | Kalaitzis, Christos Patris, Emmanuel Deligeorgiou, Evangelia Sountoulides, Petros Bantis, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Stilianos Touloupidis, Stavros |
author_facet | Kalaitzis, Christos Patris, Emmanuel Deligeorgiou, Evangelia Sountoulides, Petros Bantis, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Stilianos Touloupidis, Stavros |
author_sort | Kalaitzis, Christos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of a case report and literature review, diagnostic criteria and clinical significance of megacalycosis are presented. RESULT: Megacalycosis is mostly asymptomatic and is usually discovered either accidentally or as a result of its complications, such as stone formation, flank pain, hematuria, infection, and fever. The renal pelvis, infundibulum, and ureter are not dilated. Calyces have a semilunar configuration rather than the conventional triangular or conical form. The tip of each pyramid is flat, and the calyces possess neither fornix nor papillae impressions. The number of calyces is increased compared to the healthy condition, typically from 20–25. The renal parenchyma has a normal width but with a slight narrowing of the renal medulla. The kidney exhibits normal function, in particular with respect to its ability to concentrate the urine. CONCLUSION: Megacalycosis is a rare, usually unilateral dilatation of the kidney calyces in the presence of a normal, undilated renal pelvis and ureter. Its pathological significance lies in the occurrence of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4621186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46211862015-11-02 Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis Kalaitzis, Christos Patris, Emmanuel Deligeorgiou, Evangelia Sountoulides, Petros Bantis, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Stilianos Touloupidis, Stavros Res Rep Urol Case Report OBJECTIVE: To describe the radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of a case report and literature review, diagnostic criteria and clinical significance of megacalycosis are presented. RESULT: Megacalycosis is mostly asymptomatic and is usually discovered either accidentally or as a result of its complications, such as stone formation, flank pain, hematuria, infection, and fever. The renal pelvis, infundibulum, and ureter are not dilated. Calyces have a semilunar configuration rather than the conventional triangular or conical form. The tip of each pyramid is flat, and the calyces possess neither fornix nor papillae impressions. The number of calyces is increased compared to the healthy condition, typically from 20–25. The renal parenchyma has a normal width but with a slight narrowing of the renal medulla. The kidney exhibits normal function, in particular with respect to its ability to concentrate the urine. CONCLUSION: Megacalycosis is a rare, usually unilateral dilatation of the kidney calyces in the presence of a normal, undilated renal pelvis and ureter. Its pathological significance lies in the occurrence of complications. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4621186/ /pubmed/26528455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S81519 Text en © 2015 Kalaitzis et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kalaitzis, Christos Patris, Emmanuel Deligeorgiou, Evangelia Sountoulides, Petros Bantis, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Stilianos Touloupidis, Stavros Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title | Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title_full | Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title_fullStr | Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title_short | Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
title_sort | radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S81519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalaitzischristos radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT patrisemmanuel radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT deligeorgiouevangelia radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT sountoulidespetros radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT bantisathanasios radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT giannakopoulosstilianos radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis AT touloupidisstavros radiologicalfindingsandtheclinicalimportanceofmegacalycosis |