Cargando…

Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas using the MyoSure(®) device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, comparative treatment trial conducted by five private Obstetrics and Gynecolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukes, Andrea S, Roy, Kelly H, Presthus, James B, Diamond, Michael P, Berman, Jay M, Konsker, Kenneth A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S50101
_version_ 1782397409302675456
author Lukes, Andrea S
Roy, Kelly H
Presthus, James B
Diamond, Michael P
Berman, Jay M
Konsker, Kenneth A
author_facet Lukes, Andrea S
Roy, Kelly H
Presthus, James B
Diamond, Michael P
Berman, Jay M
Konsker, Kenneth A
author_sort Lukes, Andrea S
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas using the MyoSure(®) device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, comparative treatment trial conducted by five private Obstetrics and Gynecology practices in the USA. Forty premenopausal women aged 18 years and older were randomized to receive either a combination para/intracervical block protocol of 37 cc local anesthetic administered at six injections sites in association with the application of topic 1% lidocaine gel, or an intracervical block protocol of 22 cc local anesthetic administered at three injections sites without topical anesthetic, for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps and/or a single type 0 or type 1 submucosal myoma ≤3 cm. The main outcomes were a composite measure of procedure-related pain and pain during the postoperative recovery period, assessed by the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale (0= no pain to 10= maximum pain). The lesion characteristics, procedure time, and adverse events were summarized. RESULTS: A total of 17 polyps and eight myomas were removed in the para/intracervical block group, with diameters of 1.3±0.5 cm and 1.8±0.8 cm, respectively. In the intracervical block group, 25 polyps with a mean diameter of 1.2±0.7 cm and 7 myomas with a mean diameter of 1.9±0.9 cm were removed. The mean tissue resection time was 1.2±2.0 minutes and 1.2±1.4 minutes for the para/intracervical and intracervical block groups, respectively. The mean composite procedure-related pain score was low for both cervical block protocols, 1.3±1.4 in the para/intracervical block group vs 2.1±1.5 in the intracervical block group. During the postoperative recovery period, the mean pain scores were 0.3±0.7 vs 1.2±1.7 for the para/intracervical and intracervical block groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The MyoSure procedure for removal of polyps and myomas was well tolerated, with low pain scores reported for both the para/intracervical and intracervical block protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46212762015-11-05 Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas Lukes, Andrea S Roy, Kelly H Presthus, James B Diamond, Michael P Berman, Jay M Konsker, Kenneth A Int J Womens Health Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas using the MyoSure(®) device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, comparative treatment trial conducted by five private Obstetrics and Gynecology practices in the USA. Forty premenopausal women aged 18 years and older were randomized to receive either a combination para/intracervical block protocol of 37 cc local anesthetic administered at six injections sites in association with the application of topic 1% lidocaine gel, or an intracervical block protocol of 22 cc local anesthetic administered at three injections sites without topical anesthetic, for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps and/or a single type 0 or type 1 submucosal myoma ≤3 cm. The main outcomes were a composite measure of procedure-related pain and pain during the postoperative recovery period, assessed by the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale (0= no pain to 10= maximum pain). The lesion characteristics, procedure time, and adverse events were summarized. RESULTS: A total of 17 polyps and eight myomas were removed in the para/intracervical block group, with diameters of 1.3±0.5 cm and 1.8±0.8 cm, respectively. In the intracervical block group, 25 polyps with a mean diameter of 1.2±0.7 cm and 7 myomas with a mean diameter of 1.9±0.9 cm were removed. The mean tissue resection time was 1.2±2.0 minutes and 1.2±1.4 minutes for the para/intracervical and intracervical block groups, respectively. The mean composite procedure-related pain score was low for both cervical block protocols, 1.3±1.4 in the para/intracervical block group vs 2.1±1.5 in the intracervical block group. During the postoperative recovery period, the mean pain scores were 0.3±0.7 vs 1.2±1.7 for the para/intracervical and intracervical block groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The MyoSure procedure for removal of polyps and myomas was well tolerated, with low pain scores reported for both the para/intracervical and intracervical block protocols. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4621276/ /pubmed/26543383 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S50101 Text en © 2015 Lukes et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lukes, Andrea S
Roy, Kelly H
Presthus, James B
Diamond, Michael P
Berman, Jay M
Konsker, Kenneth A
Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title_full Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title_fullStr Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title_full_unstemmed Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title_short Randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
title_sort randomized comparative trial of cervical block protocols for pain management during hysteroscopic removal of polyps and myomas
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S50101
work_keys_str_mv AT lukesandreas randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas
AT roykellyh randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas
AT presthusjamesb randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas
AT diamondmichaelp randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas
AT bermanjaym randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas
AT konskerkennetha randomizedcomparativetrialofcervicalblockprotocolsforpainmanagementduringhysteroscopicremovalofpolypsandmyomas