Cargando…
Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice
The concept of a minimal risk threshold in research, beneath which exception to informed consent and ethics review processes may occur, has been codified for over 30 years in many national research regulations and by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Although minimal r...
Autores principales: | Wada, Kyoko, Nisker, Jeff |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102231 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices
por: Wisgalla, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: A conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendations
por: Gupta, Umesh Chandra, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Rapid commentary: Ethical implications for clinical trialists and patients associated with COVID-19 research
por: Delanerolle, Gayathri, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis
por: O'Sullivan, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)