Cargando…

Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds

The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Atteveldt, Nienke, Musacchia, Gabriella, Zion-Golumbic, Elana, Sehatpour, Pejman, Javitt, Daniel C., Schroeder, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663
_version_ 1782397432201478144
author van Atteveldt, Nienke
Musacchia, Gabriella
Zion-Golumbic, Elana
Sehatpour, Pejman
Javitt, Daniel C.
Schroeder, Charles
author_facet van Atteveldt, Nienke
Musacchia, Gabriella
Zion-Golumbic, Elana
Sehatpour, Pejman
Javitt, Daniel C.
Schroeder, Charles
author_sort van Atteveldt, Nienke
collection PubMed
description The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they will enter at optimal processing phases of the spontaneously occurring rhythmic excitability fluctuations. However, some contexts have a more predictable temporal structure than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the processing of rhythmic sounds is more efficient than the processing of irregularly timed sounds. To do this, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electro-encephalograms (EEG) while participants detected oddball target sounds in alternating blocks of rhythmic (e.g., with equal inter-stimulus intervals) or random (e.g., with randomly varied inter-stimulus intervals) tone sequences. Behaviorally, participants detected target sounds faster and more accurately when embedded in rhythmic streams. The fMRI response in the auditory cortex was stronger during random compared to random tone sequence processing. Simultaneously recorded N1 responses showed larger peak amplitudes and longer latencies for tones in the random (vs. the rhythmic) streams. These results reveal complementary evidence for more efficient neural and perceptual processing during temporally predictable sensory contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46213862015-11-17 Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds van Atteveldt, Nienke Musacchia, Gabriella Zion-Golumbic, Elana Sehatpour, Pejman Javitt, Daniel C. Schroeder, Charles Front Psychol Psychology The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they will enter at optimal processing phases of the spontaneously occurring rhythmic excitability fluctuations. However, some contexts have a more predictable temporal structure than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the processing of rhythmic sounds is more efficient than the processing of irregularly timed sounds. To do this, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electro-encephalograms (EEG) while participants detected oddball target sounds in alternating blocks of rhythmic (e.g., with equal inter-stimulus intervals) or random (e.g., with randomly varied inter-stimulus intervals) tone sequences. Behaviorally, participants detected target sounds faster and more accurately when embedded in rhythmic streams. The fMRI response in the auditory cortex was stronger during random compared to random tone sequence processing. Simultaneously recorded N1 responses showed larger peak amplitudes and longer latencies for tones in the random (vs. the rhythmic) streams. These results reveal complementary evidence for more efficient neural and perceptual processing during temporally predictable sensory contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4621386/ /pubmed/26579044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663 Text en Copyright © 2015 van Atteveldt, Musacchia, Zion-Golumbic, Sehatpour, Javitt and Schroeder. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
van Atteveldt, Nienke
Musacchia, Gabriella
Zion-Golumbic, Elana
Sehatpour, Pejman
Javitt, Daniel C.
Schroeder, Charles
Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title_full Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title_fullStr Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title_full_unstemmed Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title_short Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
title_sort complementary fmri and eeg evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663
work_keys_str_mv AT vanatteveldtnienke complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds
AT musacchiagabriella complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds
AT ziongolumbicelana complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds
AT sehatpourpejman complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds
AT javittdanielc complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds
AT schroedercharles complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds