Cargando…
Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds
The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663 |
_version_ | 1782397432201478144 |
---|---|
author | van Atteveldt, Nienke Musacchia, Gabriella Zion-Golumbic, Elana Sehatpour, Pejman Javitt, Daniel C. Schroeder, Charles |
author_facet | van Atteveldt, Nienke Musacchia, Gabriella Zion-Golumbic, Elana Sehatpour, Pejman Javitt, Daniel C. Schroeder, Charles |
author_sort | van Atteveldt, Nienke |
collection | PubMed |
description | The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they will enter at optimal processing phases of the spontaneously occurring rhythmic excitability fluctuations. However, some contexts have a more predictable temporal structure than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the processing of rhythmic sounds is more efficient than the processing of irregularly timed sounds. To do this, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electro-encephalograms (EEG) while participants detected oddball target sounds in alternating blocks of rhythmic (e.g., with equal inter-stimulus intervals) or random (e.g., with randomly varied inter-stimulus intervals) tone sequences. Behaviorally, participants detected target sounds faster and more accurately when embedded in rhythmic streams. The fMRI response in the auditory cortex was stronger during random compared to random tone sequence processing. Simultaneously recorded N1 responses showed larger peak amplitudes and longer latencies for tones in the random (vs. the rhythmic) streams. These results reveal complementary evidence for more efficient neural and perceptual processing during temporally predictable sensory contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4621386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46213862015-11-17 Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds van Atteveldt, Nienke Musacchia, Gabriella Zion-Golumbic, Elana Sehatpour, Pejman Javitt, Daniel C. Schroeder, Charles Front Psychol Psychology The brain’s fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they will enter at optimal processing phases of the spontaneously occurring rhythmic excitability fluctuations. However, some contexts have a more predictable temporal structure than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the processing of rhythmic sounds is more efficient than the processing of irregularly timed sounds. To do this, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electro-encephalograms (EEG) while participants detected oddball target sounds in alternating blocks of rhythmic (e.g., with equal inter-stimulus intervals) or random (e.g., with randomly varied inter-stimulus intervals) tone sequences. Behaviorally, participants detected target sounds faster and more accurately when embedded in rhythmic streams. The fMRI response in the auditory cortex was stronger during random compared to random tone sequence processing. Simultaneously recorded N1 responses showed larger peak amplitudes and longer latencies for tones in the random (vs. the rhythmic) streams. These results reveal complementary evidence for more efficient neural and perceptual processing during temporally predictable sensory contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4621386/ /pubmed/26579044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663 Text en Copyright © 2015 van Atteveldt, Musacchia, Zion-Golumbic, Sehatpour, Javitt and Schroeder. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology van Atteveldt, Nienke Musacchia, Gabriella Zion-Golumbic, Elana Sehatpour, Pejman Javitt, Daniel C. Schroeder, Charles Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title | Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title_full | Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title_fullStr | Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title_full_unstemmed | Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title_short | Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
title_sort | complementary fmri and eeg evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanatteveldtnienke complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds AT musacchiagabriella complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds AT ziongolumbicelana complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds AT sehatpourpejman complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds AT javittdanielc complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds AT schroedercharles complementaryfmriandeegevidenceformoreefficientneuralprocessingofrhythmicvsunpredictablytimedsounds |