Cargando…

Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching

When participants rapidly switch between tasks that share the same stimuli and responses, task confusions (i.e., the accidental application of the wrong task) can occur. The present study investigated whether these task confusions result from failures of endogenous control (i.e., from ineffective ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinhauser, Marco, Gade, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01671
_version_ 1782397432425873408
author Steinhauser, Marco
Gade, Miriam
author_facet Steinhauser, Marco
Gade, Miriam
author_sort Steinhauser, Marco
collection PubMed
description When participants rapidly switch between tasks that share the same stimuli and responses, task confusions (i.e., the accidental application of the wrong task) can occur. The present study investigated whether these task confusions result from failures of endogenous control (i.e., from ineffective task preparation) or from failures of exogenous control (i.e., from stimulus-induced task conflicts). The frequency of task confusions was estimated by considering the relative proportion of distractor errors, that is, errors that result when participants erroneously respond to the distractor associated with the alternative task. In Experiment 1, the efficiency of exogenous control was manipulated by varying the temporal order of target and distractor presentation. In Experiment 2, the efficiency of endogenous control was manipulated by varying the time available for preparing the task in advance. It turned out that only the efficiency of exogenous control but not the efficiency of endogenous control influenced the proportion of distractor errors. Accordingly, task confusions are more related to failures in exogenous control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46213872015-11-17 Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching Steinhauser, Marco Gade, Miriam Front Psychol Psychology When participants rapidly switch between tasks that share the same stimuli and responses, task confusions (i.e., the accidental application of the wrong task) can occur. The present study investigated whether these task confusions result from failures of endogenous control (i.e., from ineffective task preparation) or from failures of exogenous control (i.e., from stimulus-induced task conflicts). The frequency of task confusions was estimated by considering the relative proportion of distractor errors, that is, errors that result when participants erroneously respond to the distractor associated with the alternative task. In Experiment 1, the efficiency of exogenous control was manipulated by varying the temporal order of target and distractor presentation. In Experiment 2, the efficiency of endogenous control was manipulated by varying the time available for preparing the task in advance. It turned out that only the efficiency of exogenous control but not the efficiency of endogenous control influenced the proportion of distractor errors. Accordingly, task confusions are more related to failures in exogenous control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4621387/ /pubmed/26579050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01671 Text en Copyright © 2015 Steinhauser and Gade. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Steinhauser, Marco
Gade, Miriam
Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title_full Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title_fullStr Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title_full_unstemmed Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title_short Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
title_sort distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01671
work_keys_str_mv AT steinhausermarco distractoronsetbutnotpreparationtimeaffectsthefrequencyoftaskconfusionsintaskswitching
AT gademiriam distractoronsetbutnotpreparationtimeaffectsthefrequencyoftaskconfusionsintaskswitching