Cargando…

Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care environments, stroke patients are vulnerable to errors in communication of diagnosis and treatment. This study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Chloé E., Varma, Priya, Lenrow, David, Price, Raymond S., Kasner, Scott E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227
_version_ 1782397439840354304
author Hill, Chloé E.
Varma, Priya
Lenrow, David
Price, Raymond S.
Kasner, Scott E.
author_facet Hill, Chloé E.
Varma, Priya
Lenrow, David
Price, Raymond S.
Kasner, Scott E.
author_sort Hill, Chloé E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care environments, stroke patients are vulnerable to errors in communication of diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to demonstrate that formalized communication between the neurology team and the rehabilitation medicine team would promote secondary stroke prevention and minimize interruptions during rehabilitation. METHODS: The intervention was a standardized verbal handoff by phone between the discharging neurology resident and the admitting rehabilitation resident regarding each patient at transfer. This retrospective cohort study compared a pre-intervention control group (September 2012 to February 2013) and a post-intervention group transferred with the handoff (September 2013 to January 2014). The outcomes measured included errors in communication of stroke severity, stroke mechanism, medications, and recommended follow-up (appointments and tests) as well as emergent brain imaging, return to the acute care facility, and readmission. RESULTS: The pre- and post-intervention groups were similar with respect to number of patients (50 vs. 52) and demographics including gender (52 vs. 54% female), age (65.8 vs. 64.0 years), severity of illness as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (10 vs. 6.5), and stroke type (84 vs. 77% ischemic). Implementation of the handoff decreased errors in communication of diagnosis (NIHSS 92 vs. 74%, p = 0.02; stroke mechanism 54 vs. 30%, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the handoff decreased the proportion with errors in reconciliation of critical medications (42 vs. 23%, p = 0.04). However, the intervention did not significantly reduce interruptions of the rehabilitation program, such as emergent brain imaging (8 vs. 12%, p = 0.55), or transfers back to the acute care hospital (26 vs. 21%, p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Standardized handoffs decreased errors in communication of diagnosis and critical medications for secondary stroke prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46214252015-11-17 Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation Hill, Chloé E. Varma, Priya Lenrow, David Price, Raymond S. Kasner, Scott E. Front Neurol Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care environments, stroke patients are vulnerable to errors in communication of diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to demonstrate that formalized communication between the neurology team and the rehabilitation medicine team would promote secondary stroke prevention and minimize interruptions during rehabilitation. METHODS: The intervention was a standardized verbal handoff by phone between the discharging neurology resident and the admitting rehabilitation resident regarding each patient at transfer. This retrospective cohort study compared a pre-intervention control group (September 2012 to February 2013) and a post-intervention group transferred with the handoff (September 2013 to January 2014). The outcomes measured included errors in communication of stroke severity, stroke mechanism, medications, and recommended follow-up (appointments and tests) as well as emergent brain imaging, return to the acute care facility, and readmission. RESULTS: The pre- and post-intervention groups were similar with respect to number of patients (50 vs. 52) and demographics including gender (52 vs. 54% female), age (65.8 vs. 64.0 years), severity of illness as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (10 vs. 6.5), and stroke type (84 vs. 77% ischemic). Implementation of the handoff decreased errors in communication of diagnosis (NIHSS 92 vs. 74%, p = 0.02; stroke mechanism 54 vs. 30%, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the handoff decreased the proportion with errors in reconciliation of critical medications (42 vs. 23%, p = 0.04). However, the intervention did not significantly reduce interruptions of the rehabilitation program, such as emergent brain imaging (8 vs. 12%, p = 0.55), or transfers back to the acute care hospital (26 vs. 21%, p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Standardized handoffs decreased errors in communication of diagnosis and critical medications for secondary stroke prevention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4621425/ /pubmed/26579070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hill, Varma, Lenrow, Price and Kasner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hill, Chloé E.
Varma, Priya
Lenrow, David
Price, Raymond S.
Kasner, Scott E.
Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title_full Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title_short Reducing Errors in Transition from Acute Stroke Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation
title_sort reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227
work_keys_str_mv AT hillchloee reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT varmapriya reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT lenrowdavid reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT priceraymonds reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT kasnerscotte reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation