Cargando…

Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks

Clinical and environmental meta-omics studies are accumulating an ever-growing amount of microbial abundance data over a wide range of ecosystems. With a sufficiently large sample number, these microbial communities can be explored by constructing and analyzing co-occurrence networks, which detect t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faust, Karoline, Lima-Mendez, Gipsi, Lerat, Jean-Sébastien, Sathirapongsasuti, Jarupon F., Knight, Rob, Huttenhower, Curtis, Lenaerts, Tom, Raes, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01200
_version_ 1782397442398879744
author Faust, Karoline
Lima-Mendez, Gipsi
Lerat, Jean-Sébastien
Sathirapongsasuti, Jarupon F.
Knight, Rob
Huttenhower, Curtis
Lenaerts, Tom
Raes, Jeroen
author_facet Faust, Karoline
Lima-Mendez, Gipsi
Lerat, Jean-Sébastien
Sathirapongsasuti, Jarupon F.
Knight, Rob
Huttenhower, Curtis
Lenaerts, Tom
Raes, Jeroen
author_sort Faust, Karoline
collection PubMed
description Clinical and environmental meta-omics studies are accumulating an ever-growing amount of microbial abundance data over a wide range of ecosystems. With a sufficiently large sample number, these microbial communities can be explored by constructing and analyzing co-occurrence networks, which detect taxon associations from abundance data and can give insights into community structure. Here, we investigate how co-occurrence networks differ across biomes and which other factors influence their properties. For this, we inferred microbial association networks from 20 different 16S rDNA sequencing data sets and observed that soil microbial networks harbor proportionally fewer positive associations and are less densely interconnected than host-associated networks. After excluding sample number, sequencing depth and beta-diversity as possible drivers, we found a negative correlation between community evenness and positive edge percentage. This correlation likely results from a skewed distribution of negative interactions, which take place preferentially between less prevalent taxa. Overall, our results suggest an under-appreciated role of evenness in shaping microbial association networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46214372015-11-17 Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks Faust, Karoline Lima-Mendez, Gipsi Lerat, Jean-Sébastien Sathirapongsasuti, Jarupon F. Knight, Rob Huttenhower, Curtis Lenaerts, Tom Raes, Jeroen Front Microbiol Microbiology Clinical and environmental meta-omics studies are accumulating an ever-growing amount of microbial abundance data over a wide range of ecosystems. With a sufficiently large sample number, these microbial communities can be explored by constructing and analyzing co-occurrence networks, which detect taxon associations from abundance data and can give insights into community structure. Here, we investigate how co-occurrence networks differ across biomes and which other factors influence their properties. For this, we inferred microbial association networks from 20 different 16S rDNA sequencing data sets and observed that soil microbial networks harbor proportionally fewer positive associations and are less densely interconnected than host-associated networks. After excluding sample number, sequencing depth and beta-diversity as possible drivers, we found a negative correlation between community evenness and positive edge percentage. This correlation likely results from a skewed distribution of negative interactions, which take place preferentially between less prevalent taxa. Overall, our results suggest an under-appreciated role of evenness in shaping microbial association networks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4621437/ /pubmed/26579106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01200 Text en Copyright © 2015 Faust, Lima-Mendez, Lerat, Sathirapongsasuti, Knight, Huttenhower, Lenaerts and Raes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Faust, Karoline
Lima-Mendez, Gipsi
Lerat, Jean-Sébastien
Sathirapongsasuti, Jarupon F.
Knight, Rob
Huttenhower, Curtis
Lenaerts, Tom
Raes, Jeroen
Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title_full Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title_fullStr Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title_full_unstemmed Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title_short Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
title_sort cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01200
work_keys_str_mv AT faustkaroline crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT limamendezgipsi crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT leratjeansebastien crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT sathirapongsasutijaruponf crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT knightrob crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT huttenhowercurtis crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT lenaertstom crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks
AT raesjeroen crossbiomecomparisonofmicrobialassociationnetworks