Cargando…

Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ercan, Önder, Köstü, Bülent, Bakacak, Murat, Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf, Çoşkun, Bora, Avcı, Fazıl, Efe, Erkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26446328
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016
_version_ 1782397487817949184
author Ercan, Önder
Köstü, Bülent
Bakacak, Murat
Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf
Çoşkun, Bora
Avcı, Fazıl
Efe, Erkan
author_facet Ercan, Önder
Köstü, Bülent
Bakacak, Murat
Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf
Çoşkun, Bora
Avcı, Fazıl
Efe, Erkan
author_sort Ercan, Önder
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients’ OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 ± 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 ± 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 ± 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 ± 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 ± 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46217232015-10-30 Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder Ercan, Önder Köstü, Bülent Bakacak, Murat Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf Çoşkun, Bora Avcı, Fazıl Efe, Erkan Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients’ OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 ± 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 ± 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 ± 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 ± 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 ± 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine. Saudi Medical Journal 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4621723/ /pubmed/26446328 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ercan, Önder
Köstü, Bülent
Bakacak, Murat
Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf
Çoşkun, Bora
Avcı, Fazıl
Efe, Erkan
Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title_full Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title_fullStr Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title_short Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
title_sort comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26446328
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016
work_keys_str_mv AT ercanonder comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT kostubulent comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT bakacakmurat comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT aytactohmayusuf comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT coskunbora comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT avcıfazıl comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder
AT efeerkan comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder