Cargando…
Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Saudi Medical Journal
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26446328 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016 |
_version_ | 1782397487817949184 |
---|---|
author | Ercan, Önder Köstü, Bülent Bakacak, Murat Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf Çoşkun, Bora Avcı, Fazıl Efe, Erkan |
author_facet | Ercan, Önder Köstü, Bülent Bakacak, Murat Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf Çoşkun, Bora Avcı, Fazıl Efe, Erkan |
author_sort | Ercan, Önder |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients’ OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 ± 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 ± 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 ± 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 ± 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 ± 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4621723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Saudi Medical Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46217232015-10-30 Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder Ercan, Önder Köstü, Bülent Bakacak, Murat Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf Çoşkun, Bora Avcı, Fazıl Efe, Erkan Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients’ OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 ± 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 ± 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 ± 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 ± 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 ± 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine. Saudi Medical Journal 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4621723/ /pubmed/26446328 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ercan, Önder Köstü, Bülent Bakacak, Murat Aytaç-Tohma, Yusuf Çoşkun, Bora Avcı, Fazıl Efe, Erkan Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title | Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title_full | Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title_fullStr | Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title_short | Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
title_sort | comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26446328 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ercanonder comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT kostubulent comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT bakacakmurat comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT aytactohmayusuf comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT coskunbora comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT avcıfazıl comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder AT efeerkan comparisonofsolifenacinandfesoterodineintreatmentofoveractivebladder |