Cargando…

SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer

Genomic instability is a fundamental feature of human cancer often resulting from impaired genome maintenance. In prostate cancer, structural genomic rearrangements are a common mechanism driving tumorigenesis. However, somatic alterations predisposing to chromosomal rearrangements in prostate cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boysen, Gunther, Barbieri, Christopher E, Prandi, Davide, Blattner, Mirjam, Chae, Sung-Suk, Dahija, Arun, Nataraj, Srilakshmi, Huang, Dennis, Marotz, Clarisse, Xu, Limei, Huang, Julie, Lecca, Paola, Chhangawala, Sagar, Liu, Deli, Zhou, Pengbo, Sboner, Andrea, de Bono, Johann S, Demichelis, Francesca, Houvras, Yariv, Rubin, Mark A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374986
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207
_version_ 1782397492911931392
author Boysen, Gunther
Barbieri, Christopher E
Prandi, Davide
Blattner, Mirjam
Chae, Sung-Suk
Dahija, Arun
Nataraj, Srilakshmi
Huang, Dennis
Marotz, Clarisse
Xu, Limei
Huang, Julie
Lecca, Paola
Chhangawala, Sagar
Liu, Deli
Zhou, Pengbo
Sboner, Andrea
de Bono, Johann S
Demichelis, Francesca
Houvras, Yariv
Rubin, Mark A
author_facet Boysen, Gunther
Barbieri, Christopher E
Prandi, Davide
Blattner, Mirjam
Chae, Sung-Suk
Dahija, Arun
Nataraj, Srilakshmi
Huang, Dennis
Marotz, Clarisse
Xu, Limei
Huang, Julie
Lecca, Paola
Chhangawala, Sagar
Liu, Deli
Zhou, Pengbo
Sboner, Andrea
de Bono, Johann S
Demichelis, Francesca
Houvras, Yariv
Rubin, Mark A
author_sort Boysen, Gunther
collection PubMed
description Genomic instability is a fundamental feature of human cancer often resulting from impaired genome maintenance. In prostate cancer, structural genomic rearrangements are a common mechanism driving tumorigenesis. However, somatic alterations predisposing to chromosomal rearrangements in prostate cancer remain largely undefined. Here, we show that SPOP, the most commonly mutated gene in primary prostate cancer modulates DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, and that SPOP mutation is associated with genomic instability. In vivo, SPOP mutation results in a transcriptional response consistent with BRCA1 inactivation resulting in impaired homology-directed repair (HDR) of DSB. Furthermore, we found that SPOP mutation sensitizes to DNA damaging therapeutic agents such as PARP inhibitors. These results implicate SPOP as a novel participant in DSB repair, suggest that SPOP mutation drives prostate tumorigenesis in part through genomic instability, and indicate that mutant SPOP may increase response to DNA-damaging therapeutics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207.001
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4621745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46217452015-10-28 SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer Boysen, Gunther Barbieri, Christopher E Prandi, Davide Blattner, Mirjam Chae, Sung-Suk Dahija, Arun Nataraj, Srilakshmi Huang, Dennis Marotz, Clarisse Xu, Limei Huang, Julie Lecca, Paola Chhangawala, Sagar Liu, Deli Zhou, Pengbo Sboner, Andrea de Bono, Johann S Demichelis, Francesca Houvras, Yariv Rubin, Mark A eLife Cell Biology Genomic instability is a fundamental feature of human cancer often resulting from impaired genome maintenance. In prostate cancer, structural genomic rearrangements are a common mechanism driving tumorigenesis. However, somatic alterations predisposing to chromosomal rearrangements in prostate cancer remain largely undefined. Here, we show that SPOP, the most commonly mutated gene in primary prostate cancer modulates DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, and that SPOP mutation is associated with genomic instability. In vivo, SPOP mutation results in a transcriptional response consistent with BRCA1 inactivation resulting in impaired homology-directed repair (HDR) of DSB. Furthermore, we found that SPOP mutation sensitizes to DNA damaging therapeutic agents such as PARP inhibitors. These results implicate SPOP as a novel participant in DSB repair, suggest that SPOP mutation drives prostate tumorigenesis in part through genomic instability, and indicate that mutant SPOP may increase response to DNA-damaging therapeutics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4621745/ /pubmed/26374986 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207 Text en © 2015, Boysen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cell Biology
Boysen, Gunther
Barbieri, Christopher E
Prandi, Davide
Blattner, Mirjam
Chae, Sung-Suk
Dahija, Arun
Nataraj, Srilakshmi
Huang, Dennis
Marotz, Clarisse
Xu, Limei
Huang, Julie
Lecca, Paola
Chhangawala, Sagar
Liu, Deli
Zhou, Pengbo
Sboner, Andrea
de Bono, Johann S
Demichelis, Francesca
Houvras, Yariv
Rubin, Mark A
SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title_full SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title_fullStr SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title_short SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
title_sort spop mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
topic Cell Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374986
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207
work_keys_str_mv AT boysengunther spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT barbierichristophere spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT prandidavide spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT blattnermirjam spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT chaesungsuk spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT dahijaarun spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT natarajsrilakshmi spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT huangdennis spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT marotzclarisse spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT xulimei spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT huangjulie spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT leccapaola spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT chhangawalasagar spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT liudeli spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT zhoupengbo spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT sbonerandrea spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT debonojohanns spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT demichelisfrancesca spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT houvrasyariv spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer
AT rubinmarka spopmutationleadstogenomicinstabilityinprostatecancer