Cargando…
Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial?
BACKGROUND: With improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques, the quality and the effectiveness of CPR have been established; nevertheless, the survival rate after cardiac arrest still remains poor. Recently, many reports have shown good outcomes in cases where extracorporeal memb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509125 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.318 |
_version_ | 1782397531026620416 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Seung-Hun Jung, Jae-Seung Lee, Kwang-Hyung Kim, Hee-Jung Son, Ho-Sung Sun, Kyung |
author_facet | Lee, Seung-Hun Jung, Jae-Seung Lee, Kwang-Hyung Kim, Hee-Jung Son, Ho-Sung Sun, Kyung |
author_sort | Lee, Seung-Hun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques, the quality and the effectiveness of CPR have been established; nevertheless, the survival rate after cardiac arrest still remains poor. Recently, many reports have shown good outcomes in cases where extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used during prolonged CPR. Accordingly, we attempted to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on the survival of patients who experienced a prolonged cardiac arrest and compared it with that of conventional CPR (CCPR). METHODS: Between March 2009 and April 2014, CPR, including both in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPR, was carried out in 955 patients. The ECPR group, counted from the start of the ECPR program in March 2010, included 81 patients in total, and the CCPR group consisted of 874 patients. All data were retrospectively collected from the patients’ medical records. RESULTS: The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate was 2.24 times better in CPR of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients than in CPR of out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) patients (p=0.0012). For every 1-minute increase in the CPR duration, the ROSC rate decreased by 1% (p=0.0228). Further, for every 10-year decrease in the age, the rate of survival discharge increased by 31%. The CPR of IHCA patients showed a 2.49 times higher survival discharge rate than the CPR of OHCA patients (p=0.03). For every 1-minute increase in the CPR duration, the rate of survival discharge was decreased by 4%. ECPR showed superiority in terms of the survival discharge in the univariate analysis, although with no statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The survival discharge rate of the ECPR group was comparable to that of the CCPR group. As the CPR duration increased, the survival discharge and the ROSC rate decreased. Therefore, a continuous effort to reduce the time for the decision of ECMO initiation and ECMO team activation is necessary, particularly during the CPR of relatively young patients and IHCA patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4622025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46220252015-10-27 Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? Lee, Seung-Hun Jung, Jae-Seung Lee, Kwang-Hyung Kim, Hee-Jung Son, Ho-Sung Sun, Kyung Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: With improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques, the quality and the effectiveness of CPR have been established; nevertheless, the survival rate after cardiac arrest still remains poor. Recently, many reports have shown good outcomes in cases where extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used during prolonged CPR. Accordingly, we attempted to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on the survival of patients who experienced a prolonged cardiac arrest and compared it with that of conventional CPR (CCPR). METHODS: Between March 2009 and April 2014, CPR, including both in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPR, was carried out in 955 patients. The ECPR group, counted from the start of the ECPR program in March 2010, included 81 patients in total, and the CCPR group consisted of 874 patients. All data were retrospectively collected from the patients’ medical records. RESULTS: The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate was 2.24 times better in CPR of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients than in CPR of out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) patients (p=0.0012). For every 1-minute increase in the CPR duration, the ROSC rate decreased by 1% (p=0.0228). Further, for every 10-year decrease in the age, the rate of survival discharge increased by 31%. The CPR of IHCA patients showed a 2.49 times higher survival discharge rate than the CPR of OHCA patients (p=0.03). For every 1-minute increase in the CPR duration, the rate of survival discharge was decreased by 4%. ECPR showed superiority in terms of the survival discharge in the univariate analysis, although with no statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The survival discharge rate of the ECPR group was comparable to that of the CCPR group. As the CPR duration increased, the survival discharge and the ROSC rate decreased. Therefore, a continuous effort to reduce the time for the decision of ECMO initiation and ECMO team activation is necessary, particularly during the CPR of relatively young patients and IHCA patients. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2015-10 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4622025/ /pubmed/26509125 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.318 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Lee, Seung-Hun Jung, Jae-Seung Lee, Kwang-Hyung Kim, Hee-Jung Son, Ho-Sung Sun, Kyung Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title | Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title_full | Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title_short | Comparison of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? |
title_sort | comparison of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: is extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation beneficial? |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509125 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeseunghun comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial AT jungjaeseung comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial AT leekwanghyung comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial AT kimheejung comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial AT sonhosung comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial AT sunkyung comparisonofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithconventionalcardiopulmonaryresuscitationisextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationbeneficial |