Cargando…

Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy

BACKGROUND: There have been a number of studies on mitral valve replacement and repeated percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy for mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. However, studies on mitral valve repair for these patients are rare. In this study, we analyzed post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seong, Chee, Hyun Keun, Kim, Jun Seok, Song, Myong Gun, Park, Jae Bum, Shin, Je Kyoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509126
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.328
_version_ 1782397534030790656
author Lee, Seong
Chee, Hyun Keun
Kim, Jun Seok
Song, Myong Gun
Park, Jae Bum
Shin, Je Kyoun
author_facet Lee, Seong
Chee, Hyun Keun
Kim, Jun Seok
Song, Myong Gun
Park, Jae Bum
Shin, Je Kyoun
author_sort Lee, Seong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been a number of studies on mitral valve replacement and repeated percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy for mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. However, studies on mitral valve repair for these patients are rare. In this study, we analyzed postoperative outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. METHODS: In this study, we assessed 15 patients (mean age, 47.7±9.7 years; 11 female and 4 male) who underwent mitral valve repair between August 2008 and March 2013 for symptomatic mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. The mean interval between the initial percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy and the mitral valve repair was 13.5±7 years. The mean preoperative Wilkins score was 9.4±2.6. RESULTS: The mean mitral valve area obtained using planimetry increased from 1.16±0.16 cm(2) to 1.62±0.34 cm(2) (p=0.0001). The mean pressure half time obtained using Doppler ultrasound decreased from 202.4±58.6 ms to 152±50.2 ms (p=0.0001). The mean pressure gradient obtained using Doppler ultrasound decreased from 9.4±4.0 mmHg to 5.8±1.5 mmHg (p=0.0021). There were no early or late deaths. Thromboembolic events or infective endocarditis did not occur. Reoperations such as mitral valve repair or mitral valve replacement were not performed during the follow-up period (39±16 months). The 5-year event-free survival was 56.16% (95% confidence interval, 47.467–64.866). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, we could not conclude that mitral valve repair could be an alternative for patients with mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. However, some patients presented with results similar to those of mitral valve replacement. Further studies including more patients with long-term follow-up are necessary to determine the possibility of this application of mitral valve repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4622038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46220382015-10-27 Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy Lee, Seong Chee, Hyun Keun Kim, Jun Seok Song, Myong Gun Park, Jae Bum Shin, Je Kyoun Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: There have been a number of studies on mitral valve replacement and repeated percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy for mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. However, studies on mitral valve repair for these patients are rare. In this study, we analyzed postoperative outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. METHODS: In this study, we assessed 15 patients (mean age, 47.7±9.7 years; 11 female and 4 male) who underwent mitral valve repair between August 2008 and March 2013 for symptomatic mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. The mean interval between the initial percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy and the mitral valve repair was 13.5±7 years. The mean preoperative Wilkins score was 9.4±2.6. RESULTS: The mean mitral valve area obtained using planimetry increased from 1.16±0.16 cm(2) to 1.62±0.34 cm(2) (p=0.0001). The mean pressure half time obtained using Doppler ultrasound decreased from 202.4±58.6 ms to 152±50.2 ms (p=0.0001). The mean pressure gradient obtained using Doppler ultrasound decreased from 9.4±4.0 mmHg to 5.8±1.5 mmHg (p=0.0021). There were no early or late deaths. Thromboembolic events or infective endocarditis did not occur. Reoperations such as mitral valve repair or mitral valve replacement were not performed during the follow-up period (39±16 months). The 5-year event-free survival was 56.16% (95% confidence interval, 47.467–64.866). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, we could not conclude that mitral valve repair could be an alternative for patients with mitral valve restenosis after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. However, some patients presented with results similar to those of mitral valve replacement. Further studies including more patients with long-term follow-up are necessary to determine the possibility of this application of mitral valve repair. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2015-10 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4622038/ /pubmed/26509126 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.328 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Lee, Seong
Chee, Hyun Keun
Kim, Jun Seok
Song, Myong Gun
Park, Jae Bum
Shin, Je Kyoun
Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title_full Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title_fullStr Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title_short Postoperative Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Restenosis after Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy
title_sort postoperative outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral restenosis after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509126
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.328
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseong postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy
AT cheehyunkeun postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy
AT kimjunseok postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy
AT songmyonggun postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy
AT parkjaebum postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy
AT shinjekyoun postoperativeoutcomesofmitralvalverepairformitralrestenosisafterpercutaneousballoonmitralvalvotomy