Cargando…

Influence of Health Insurance Status on the Timing of Surgery and Treatment of Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears

BACKGROUND: Lack of insurance has been shown to lead to delays in seeking care as well as fewer preventive medicine visits and poorer overall health status. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of insurance status on the timing and treatment of patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears. STUDY DESIGN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sood, Amit, Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem, Gehrmann, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
134
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115584883
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Lack of insurance has been shown to lead to delays in seeking care as well as fewer preventive medicine visits and poorer overall health status. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of insurance status on the timing and treatment of patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Charts from 2004 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed for patients diagnosed with bucket-handle meniscus tears. Patients were divided into 2 groups: insured or underinsured. The insured group included patients with commercial insurance or Medicare. The underinsured group included patients with Medicaid or Charity Care. Time intervals were categorized as <6 weeks or ≥6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in this study: 15 (29%) insured and 37 (71%) underinsured. Underinsured patients experienced delays in initial presentation to an orthopaedic surgeon (P = .004), time from magnetic resonance imaging to surgery (P = .01), and time from injury to surgery (P = .007). Repair rates were 40% and 38% (P > .999) for the insured and underinsured, respectively. Repair rates for <6 weeks from injury to surgery were 75% for insured (P = .007) and 100% for underinsured patients (P = .001). Repair rates for ≥6 weeks from injury to surgery were 0% for insured and 30% for underinsured patients. Overall, patients with an injury-to-surgery time of <6 weeks had a significantly higher repair rate (87%) than those managed >6 weeks (19%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Underinsured patients experience significant delays in time to presentation and overall time to surgery. However, the overall repair rate between the insured and underinsured is similar. Regardless of insurance status, patients undergoing arthroscopy within 6 weeks of injury have a significantly higher repair rate than those after 6 weeks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients undergoing arthroscopy within 6 weeks of injury have a significantly higher repair rate than those after 6 weeks.