Cargando…
Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543359 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948 |
_version_ | 1782397599499681792 |
---|---|
author | Rhee, Chin Kook Chang, Jung Hyun Choi, Eu gene Kim, Hyun kuk Kwon, Yong-Soo Kyung, Sun Young Lee, Ji-Hyun Park, Myung Jae Yoo, Kwang Ha Oh, Yeon Mok |
author_facet | Rhee, Chin Kook Chang, Jung Hyun Choi, Eu gene Kim, Hyun kuk Kwon, Yong-Soo Kyung, Sun Young Lee, Ji-Hyun Park, Myung Jae Yoo, Kwang Ha Oh, Yeon Mok |
author_sort | Rhee, Chin Kook |
collection | PubMed |
description | A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, −7.7%–8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, −0.2%; 95% confidence interval, −9.0%–8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4622522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46225222015-11-05 Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial Rhee, Chin Kook Chang, Jung Hyun Choi, Eu gene Kim, Hyun kuk Kwon, Yong-Soo Kyung, Sun Young Lee, Ji-Hyun Park, Myung Jae Yoo, Kwang Ha Oh, Yeon Mok Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, −7.7%–8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, −0.2%; 95% confidence interval, −9.0%–8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4622522/ /pubmed/26543359 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948 Text en © 2015 Rhee et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rhee, Chin Kook Chang, Jung Hyun Choi, Eu gene Kim, Hyun kuk Kwon, Yong-Soo Kyung, Sun Young Lee, Ji-Hyun Park, Myung Jae Yoo, Kwang Ha Oh, Yeon Mok Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title | Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title_full | Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title_short | Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with copd exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, phase iii, non-inferiority trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543359 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rheechinkook zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT changjunghyun zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT choieugene zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT kimhyunkuk zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT kwonyongsoo zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT kyungsunyoung zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT leejihyun zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT parkmyungjae zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT yookwangha zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial AT ohyeonmok zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial |