Cargando…

Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial

A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Chin Kook, Chang, Jung Hyun, Choi, Eu gene, Kim, Hyun kuk, Kwon, Yong-Soo, Kyung, Sun Young, Lee, Ji-Hyun, Park, Myung Jae, Yoo, Kwang Ha, Oh, Yeon Mok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543359
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948
_version_ 1782397599499681792
author Rhee, Chin Kook
Chang, Jung Hyun
Choi, Eu gene
Kim, Hyun kuk
Kwon, Yong-Soo
Kyung, Sun Young
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Park, Myung Jae
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Oh, Yeon Mok
author_facet Rhee, Chin Kook
Chang, Jung Hyun
Choi, Eu gene
Kim, Hyun kuk
Kwon, Yong-Soo
Kyung, Sun Young
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Park, Myung Jae
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Oh, Yeon Mok
author_sort Rhee, Chin Kook
collection PubMed
description A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, −7.7%–8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, −0.2%; 95% confidence interval, −9.0%–8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4622522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46225222015-11-05 Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial Rhee, Chin Kook Chang, Jung Hyun Choi, Eu gene Kim, Hyun kuk Kwon, Yong-Soo Kyung, Sun Young Lee, Ji-Hyun Park, Myung Jae Yoo, Kwang Ha Oh, Yeon Mok Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, −7.7%–8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, −0.2%; 95% confidence interval, −9.0%–8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4622522/ /pubmed/26543359 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948 Text en © 2015 Rhee et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rhee, Chin Kook
Chang, Jung Hyun
Choi, Eu gene
Kim, Hyun kuk
Kwon, Yong-Soo
Kyung, Sun Young
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Park, Myung Jae
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Oh, Yeon Mok
Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title_full Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title_short Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
title_sort zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with copd exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, phase iii, non-inferiority trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543359
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S90948
work_keys_str_mv AT rheechinkook zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT changjunghyun zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT choieugene zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kimhyunkuk zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kwonyongsoo zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kyungsunyoung zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT leejihyun zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT parkmyungjae zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT yookwangha zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT ohyeonmok zabofloxacinversusmoxifloxacininpatientswithcopdexacerbationamulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyrandomizedcontrolledphaseiiinoninferioritytrial