Cargando…

Beyond conservation agriculture

Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giller, Ken E., Andersson, Jens A., Corbeels, Marc, Kirkegaard, John, Mortensen, David, Erenstein, Olaf, Vanlauwe, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579139
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870
_version_ 1782397655643586560
author Giller, Ken E.
Andersson, Jens A.
Corbeels, Marc
Kirkegaard, John
Mortensen, David
Erenstein, Olaf
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_facet Giller, Ken E.
Andersson, Jens A.
Corbeels, Marc
Kirkegaard, John
Mortensen, David
Erenstein, Olaf
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_sort Giller, Ken E.
collection PubMed
description Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4623198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46231982015-11-17 Beyond conservation agriculture Giller, Ken E. Andersson, Jens A. Corbeels, Marc Kirkegaard, John Mortensen, David Erenstein, Olaf Vanlauwe, Bernard Front Plant Sci Environmental Science Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4623198/ /pubmed/26579139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870 Text en Copyright © 2015 Giller, Andersson, Corbeels, Kirkegaard, Mortensen, Erenstein and Vanlauwe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Giller, Ken E.
Andersson, Jens A.
Corbeels, Marc
Kirkegaard, John
Mortensen, David
Erenstein, Olaf
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Beyond conservation agriculture
title Beyond conservation agriculture
title_full Beyond conservation agriculture
title_fullStr Beyond conservation agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Beyond conservation agriculture
title_short Beyond conservation agriculture
title_sort beyond conservation agriculture
topic Environmental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579139
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870
work_keys_str_mv AT gillerkene beyondconservationagriculture
AT anderssonjensa beyondconservationagriculture
AT corbeelsmarc beyondconservationagriculture
AT kirkegaardjohn beyondconservationagriculture
AT mortensendavid beyondconservationagriculture
AT erensteinolaf beyondconservationagriculture
AT vanlauwebernard beyondconservationagriculture