Cargando…
Beyond conservation agriculture
Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870 |
_version_ | 1782397655643586560 |
---|---|
author | Giller, Ken E. Andersson, Jens A. Corbeels, Marc Kirkegaard, John Mortensen, David Erenstein, Olaf Vanlauwe, Bernard |
author_facet | Giller, Ken E. Andersson, Jens A. Corbeels, Marc Kirkegaard, John Mortensen, David Erenstein, Olaf Vanlauwe, Bernard |
author_sort | Giller, Ken E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4623198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46231982015-11-17 Beyond conservation agriculture Giller, Ken E. Andersson, Jens A. Corbeels, Marc Kirkegaard, John Mortensen, David Erenstein, Olaf Vanlauwe, Bernard Front Plant Sci Environmental Science Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4623198/ /pubmed/26579139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870 Text en Copyright © 2015 Giller, Andersson, Corbeels, Kirkegaard, Mortensen, Erenstein and Vanlauwe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Environmental Science Giller, Ken E. Andersson, Jens A. Corbeels, Marc Kirkegaard, John Mortensen, David Erenstein, Olaf Vanlauwe, Bernard Beyond conservation agriculture |
title | Beyond conservation agriculture |
title_full | Beyond conservation agriculture |
title_fullStr | Beyond conservation agriculture |
title_full_unstemmed | Beyond conservation agriculture |
title_short | Beyond conservation agriculture |
title_sort | beyond conservation agriculture |
topic | Environmental Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillerkene beyondconservationagriculture AT anderssonjensa beyondconservationagriculture AT corbeelsmarc beyondconservationagriculture AT kirkegaardjohn beyondconservationagriculture AT mortensendavid beyondconservationagriculture AT erensteinolaf beyondconservationagriculture AT vanlauwebernard beyondconservationagriculture |