Cargando…
Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) crystallizable fragment (Fc) glycosylation is crucial for antibody effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and for their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics behavior. To monitor the Fc-glycosylation in bioprocess development, as well as prod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2014.986000 |
_version_ | 1782397691271053312 |
---|---|
author | Reusch, Dietmar Haberger, Markus Maier, Bernd Maier, Maria Kloseck, Ronny Zimmermann, Boris Hook, Michaela Szabo, Zoltan Tep, Samnang Wegstein, Jo Alt, Nadja Bulau, Patrick Wuhrer, Manfred |
author_facet | Reusch, Dietmar Haberger, Markus Maier, Bernd Maier, Maria Kloseck, Ronny Zimmermann, Boris Hook, Michaela Szabo, Zoltan Tep, Samnang Wegstein, Jo Alt, Nadja Bulau, Patrick Wuhrer, Manfred |
author_sort | Reusch, Dietmar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunoglobulin G (IgG) crystallizable fragment (Fc) glycosylation is crucial for antibody effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and for their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics behavior. To monitor the Fc-glycosylation in bioprocess development, as well as product characterization and release analytics, reliable techniques for glycosylation analysis are needed. A wide range of analytical methods has found its way into these applications. In this study, a comprehensive comparison was performed of separation-based methods for Fc-glycosylation profiling of an IgG biopharmaceutical. A therapeutic antibody reference material was analyzed 6-fold on 2 different days, and the methods were compared for precision, accuracy, throughput and other features; special emphasis was placed on the detection of sialic acid-containing glycans. Seven, non-mass spectrometric methods were compared; the methods utilized liquid chromatography-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, capillary electrophoresis-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, or high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-ultra high performance liquid chromatography of 2-aminobenzamide (2-AB)-labeled glycans was used as a reference method. All of the methods showed excellent precision and accuracy; some differences were observed, particularly with regard to the detection and quantitation of minor glycan species, such as sialylated glycans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4623496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46234962015-12-18 Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods Reusch, Dietmar Haberger, Markus Maier, Bernd Maier, Maria Kloseck, Ronny Zimmermann, Boris Hook, Michaela Szabo, Zoltan Tep, Samnang Wegstein, Jo Alt, Nadja Bulau, Patrick Wuhrer, Manfred MAbs Reports Immunoglobulin G (IgG) crystallizable fragment (Fc) glycosylation is crucial for antibody effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and for their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics behavior. To monitor the Fc-glycosylation in bioprocess development, as well as product characterization and release analytics, reliable techniques for glycosylation analysis are needed. A wide range of analytical methods has found its way into these applications. In this study, a comprehensive comparison was performed of separation-based methods for Fc-glycosylation profiling of an IgG biopharmaceutical. A therapeutic antibody reference material was analyzed 6-fold on 2 different days, and the methods were compared for precision, accuracy, throughput and other features; special emphasis was placed on the detection of sialic acid-containing glycans. Seven, non-mass spectrometric methods were compared; the methods utilized liquid chromatography-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, capillary electrophoresis-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, or high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-ultra high performance liquid chromatography of 2-aminobenzamide (2-AB)-labeled glycans was used as a reference method. All of the methods showed excellent precision and accuracy; some differences were observed, particularly with regard to the detection and quantitation of minor glycan species, such as sialylated glycans. Taylor & Francis 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4623496/ /pubmed/25524468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2014.986000 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Reports Reusch, Dietmar Haberger, Markus Maier, Bernd Maier, Maria Kloseck, Ronny Zimmermann, Boris Hook, Michaela Szabo, Zoltan Tep, Samnang Wegstein, Jo Alt, Nadja Bulau, Patrick Wuhrer, Manfred Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title | Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title_full | Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title_short | Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles—Part 1: Separation-based methods |
title_sort | comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin g fc-glycosylation profiles—part 1: separation-based methods |
topic | Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2014.986000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reuschdietmar comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT habergermarkus comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT maierbernd comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT maiermaria comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT kloseckronny comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT zimmermannboris comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT hookmichaela comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT szabozoltan comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT tepsamnang comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT wegsteinjo comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT altnadja comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT bulaupatrick comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods AT wuhrermanfred comparisonofmethodsfortheanalysisoftherapeuticimmunoglobulingfcglycosylationprofilespart1separationbasedmethods |