Cargando…
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Incomplete reporting has been identified as a major source of avoidable waste in biomedical research. Essential information is often not provided in study reports, impeding the identification, critical appraisal, and replication of studies. To improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy...
Autores principales: | Bossuyt, Patrick M, Reitsma, Johannes B, Bruns, David E, Gatsonis, Constantine A, Glasziou, Paul P, Irwig, Les, Lijmer, Jeroen G, Moher, David, Rennie, Drummond, de Vet, Henrica C W, Kressel, Herbert Y, Rifai, Nader, Golub, Robert M, Altman, Douglas G, Hooft, Lotty, Korevaar, Daniël A, Cohen, Jérémie F |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
por: Smidt, Nynke, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
por: Sounderajah, Viknesh, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
por: Korevaar, Daniël A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)