Cargando…

Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a worldwide health concern due to its various negative consequences. Therefore, the prevention of preterm birth is a top priority for healthcare systems in all countries. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in the preventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei, Bahrami, Elham, Sekhavat, Leila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Electronic physician 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516434
http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/1301
_version_ 1782397740402081792
author Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei
Bahrami, Elham
Sekhavat, Leila
author_facet Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei
Bahrami, Elham
Sekhavat, Leila
author_sort Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a worldwide health concern due to its various negative consequences. Therefore, the prevention of preterm birth is a top priority for healthcare systems in all countries. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in the prevention of preterm delivery. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd, Iran, from November 21, 2012 to January 20, 2015. Seventy-eight pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and one risk factor of preterm delivery were included in the study. The subjects were assigned randomly to two groups, with group one receiving Cyclogest and group two receiving 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Subsequently, we analyzed drug complications during pregnancy, delivery time, neonatal outcomes, and patients’ satisfaction among the two groups. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared, t-test, and ANOVA for the analyses of primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 39 births in group one, 33.3% occurred preterm, and, among the 39 births in group two, 30.7% occurred preterm (< 37 weeks). The mean gestational ages at delivery in groups 1 and 2 were 37.07 ± 2.23 and 36.81 ± 2.77 weeks, respectively (p = 0.765). Other variables were not significantly different between the two groups, including birth weight (p = 0.745), Apgar scores for the first and fifth minutes (p = 0.574, 0.630), length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) when the newborns needed hospitalization (p = 0.358), and the patients’ satisfaction with the drugs that were used (p = 0.615). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, vaginal progesterone and intramuscular progesterone had the same levels of effectiveness, safety and acceptance by patients in the prevention of preterm delivery. Therefore, both can be used for this purpose in clinical practices, but more studies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4623787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Electronic physician
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46237872015-10-29 Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei Bahrami, Elham Sekhavat, Leila Electron Physician Original Article BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a worldwide health concern due to its various negative consequences. Therefore, the prevention of preterm birth is a top priority for healthcare systems in all countries. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in the prevention of preterm delivery. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd, Iran, from November 21, 2012 to January 20, 2015. Seventy-eight pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and one risk factor of preterm delivery were included in the study. The subjects were assigned randomly to two groups, with group one receiving Cyclogest and group two receiving 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Subsequently, we analyzed drug complications during pregnancy, delivery time, neonatal outcomes, and patients’ satisfaction among the two groups. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared, t-test, and ANOVA for the analyses of primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 39 births in group one, 33.3% occurred preterm, and, among the 39 births in group two, 30.7% occurred preterm (< 37 weeks). The mean gestational ages at delivery in groups 1 and 2 were 37.07 ± 2.23 and 36.81 ± 2.77 weeks, respectively (p = 0.765). Other variables were not significantly different between the two groups, including birth weight (p = 0.745), Apgar scores for the first and fifth minutes (p = 0.574, 0.630), length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) when the newborns needed hospitalization (p = 0.358), and the patients’ satisfaction with the drugs that were used (p = 0.615). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, vaginal progesterone and intramuscular progesterone had the same levels of effectiveness, safety and acceptance by patients in the prevention of preterm delivery. Therefore, both can be used for this purpose in clinical practices, but more studies are needed. Electronic physician 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4623787/ /pubmed/26516434 http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/1301 Text en © 2015 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bafghi, Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei
Bahrami, Elham
Sekhavat, Leila
Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparative Study of Vaginal versus Intramuscular Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative study of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in the prevention of preterm delivery: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516434
http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/1301
work_keys_str_mv AT bafghiafsarsadattabatabaei comparativestudyofvaginalversusintramuscularprogesteroneinthepreventionofpretermdeliveryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bahramielham comparativestudyofvaginalversusintramuscularprogesteroneinthepreventionofpretermdeliveryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sekhavatleila comparativestudyofvaginalversusintramuscularprogesteroneinthepreventionofpretermdeliveryarandomizedclinicaltrial