Cargando…

Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran

INTRODUCTION: In spite of the widespread use of automation in industry, manual material handling (MMH) is still performed in many occupational settings. The emphasis on ergonomics in MMH tasks is due to the potential risks of workplace accidents and injuries. This study aimed to assess the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl, Mazlomi, Adel, Saraji, Gebraeil Nasl, Zeraati, Hojjat, Hadian, Mohammad Reza, Jafari, Amir Homayoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Electronic physician 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516443
http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/2015.1365
_version_ 1782397742483505152
author Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl
Mazlomi, Adel
Saraji, Gebraeil Nasl
Zeraati, Hojjat
Hadian, Mohammad Reza
Jafari, Amir Homayoun
author_facet Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl
Mazlomi, Adel
Saraji, Gebraeil Nasl
Zeraati, Hojjat
Hadian, Mohammad Reza
Jafari, Amir Homayoun
author_sort Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In spite of the widespread use of automation in industry, manual material handling (MMH) is still performed in many occupational settings. The emphasis on ergonomics in MMH tasks is due to the potential risks of workplace accidents and injuries. This study aimed to assess the effect of box size, frequency of lift, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) on the heart rates of male university students in Iran. METHODS: This experimental study was conducted in 2015 with 15 male students recruited from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Each participant performed 18 different lifting tasks that involved three lifting frequencies (1lift/min, 4.3 lifts/min and 6.67 lifts/min), three lifting heights (floor to knuckle, knuckle to shoulder, and shoulder to arm reach), and two box sizes. Each set of experiments was conducted during the 20 min work period using the free-style lifting technique. The working heart rates (WHR) were recorded for the entire duration. In this study, we used SPSS version 18 software and descriptive statistical methods, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the t-test for data analysis. RESULTS: The results of the ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.02). Tukey’s post hoc test indicated that there was a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0. 01). There was a significant difference between the mean heart rates in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.006), and Tukey’s post hoc test indicated a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0.004). But, there was no significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of lifting heights (p > 0.05). The results of the t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of the sizes of the two boxes (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that MAWL and heart rate are influenced by the variables of lifting frequency and the size of the boxes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4623796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Electronic physician
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46237962015-10-29 Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl Mazlomi, Adel Saraji, Gebraeil Nasl Zeraati, Hojjat Hadian, Mohammad Reza Jafari, Amir Homayoun Electron Physician Original Article INTRODUCTION: In spite of the widespread use of automation in industry, manual material handling (MMH) is still performed in many occupational settings. The emphasis on ergonomics in MMH tasks is due to the potential risks of workplace accidents and injuries. This study aimed to assess the effect of box size, frequency of lift, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) on the heart rates of male university students in Iran. METHODS: This experimental study was conducted in 2015 with 15 male students recruited from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Each participant performed 18 different lifting tasks that involved three lifting frequencies (1lift/min, 4.3 lifts/min and 6.67 lifts/min), three lifting heights (floor to knuckle, knuckle to shoulder, and shoulder to arm reach), and two box sizes. Each set of experiments was conducted during the 20 min work period using the free-style lifting technique. The working heart rates (WHR) were recorded for the entire duration. In this study, we used SPSS version 18 software and descriptive statistical methods, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the t-test for data analysis. RESULTS: The results of the ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.02). Tukey’s post hoc test indicated that there was a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0. 01). There was a significant difference between the mean heart rates in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.006), and Tukey’s post hoc test indicated a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0.004). But, there was no significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of lifting heights (p > 0.05). The results of the t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of the sizes of the two boxes (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that MAWL and heart rate are influenced by the variables of lifting frequency and the size of the boxes. Electronic physician 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4623796/ /pubmed/26516443 http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/2015.1365 Text en © 2015 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl
Mazlomi, Adel
Saraji, Gebraeil Nasl
Zeraati, Hojjat
Hadian, Mohammad Reza
Jafari, Amir Homayoun
Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title_full Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title_fullStr Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title_short Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
title_sort effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in iran
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516443
http://dx.doi.org/10.14661/2015.1365
work_keys_str_mv AT abadialisalehisahl effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran
AT mazlomiadel effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran
AT sarajigebraeilnasl effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran
AT zeraatihojjat effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran
AT hadianmohammadreza effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran
AT jafariamirhomayoun effectsofboxsizefrequencyofliftingandheightofliftonmaximumacceptableweightofliftandheartrateformaleuniversitystudentsiniran