Cargando…

Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: To compare the survival outcomes and acute toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT), and IC plus CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wen-Fei, Li, Ying-Qin, Chen, Lei, Zhang, Yuan, Guo, Rui, Zhang, Fan, Peng, Hao, Sun, Ying, Ma, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26506820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1768-x
_version_ 1782397759755649024
author Li, Wen-Fei
Li, Ying-Qin
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuan
Guo, Rui
Zhang, Fan
Peng, Hao
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
author_facet Li, Wen-Fei
Li, Ying-Qin
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuan
Guo, Rui
Zhang, Fan
Peng, Hao
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
author_sort Li, Wen-Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the survival outcomes and acute toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT), and IC plus CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Patients with stage III–IVB NPC who were treated with IMRT between 2009 and 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The induction regimens included PF (cisplatin and fluorouracil) and TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) every 3 weeks for 2–3 cycles; the concurrent regimen was cisplatin every three weeks for 2–3 cycles. A propensity score matching method was used to match patients from each group in a 1:1:1 ratio. RESULTS: In total, 147 eligible patients were propensity-matched, with 49 patients in each treatment group. The median follow-up duration was 38.5 months (range, 4.5 – 56 months). The 3-year disease-free survival, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 82.1 %, 92.8 %, 87 %, and 90.4 % in the CCRT group; 86.3 %, 91.0 %, 91.6 %, and 94.4 % in the IC plus RT group; and 87.8 %, 95.8 %, 93.8 %, and 93.9 % in the IC plus CCRT group, respectively. No statistically significant survival differences were observed between the three treatment groups in either univariate or multivariate analyses. The incidence of grade 3–4 acute toxicities was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CCRT, IC plus RT, and IC plus CCRT are similarly efficacious treatment strategies for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC treated using IMRT; however, long-term, large-scale randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4623909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46239092015-10-29 Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy Li, Wen-Fei Li, Ying-Qin Chen, Lei Zhang, Yuan Guo, Rui Zhang, Fan Peng, Hao Sun, Ying Ma, Jun BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the survival outcomes and acute toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT), and IC plus CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Patients with stage III–IVB NPC who were treated with IMRT between 2009 and 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The induction regimens included PF (cisplatin and fluorouracil) and TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) every 3 weeks for 2–3 cycles; the concurrent regimen was cisplatin every three weeks for 2–3 cycles. A propensity score matching method was used to match patients from each group in a 1:1:1 ratio. RESULTS: In total, 147 eligible patients were propensity-matched, with 49 patients in each treatment group. The median follow-up duration was 38.5 months (range, 4.5 – 56 months). The 3-year disease-free survival, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 82.1 %, 92.8 %, 87 %, and 90.4 % in the CCRT group; 86.3 %, 91.0 %, 91.6 %, and 94.4 % in the IC plus RT group; and 87.8 %, 95.8 %, 93.8 %, and 93.9 % in the IC plus CCRT group, respectively. No statistically significant survival differences were observed between the three treatment groups in either univariate or multivariate analyses. The incidence of grade 3–4 acute toxicities was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CCRT, IC plus RT, and IC plus CCRT are similarly efficacious treatment strategies for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC treated using IMRT; however, long-term, large-scale randomized trials are required to confirm these findings. BioMed Central 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4623909/ /pubmed/26506820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1768-x Text en © Li et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Wen-Fei
Li, Ying-Qin
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuan
Guo, Rui
Zhang, Fan
Peng, Hao
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_short Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_sort propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26506820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1768-x
work_keys_str_mv AT liwenfei propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT liyingqin propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT chenlei propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT zhangyuan propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT guorui propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT zhangfan propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT penghao propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT sunying propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT majun propensitymatchedanalysisofthreedifferentchemotherapysequencesinpatientswithlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy