Cargando…

Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry could potentially contribute to self-monitoring. NHS Lothian’s ‘Light Touch’ service provided COPD patients with a self-management plan based on symptoms and oximetry. The service was overseen (though not actively monitored) by respiratory-trained community teams who were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacNab, Michele, Lee, Siew Hwa, McCloughan, Lucy, Hanley, Janet, McKinstry, Brian, Pinnock, Hilary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2
_version_ 1782397790325833728
author MacNab, Michele
Lee, Siew Hwa
McCloughan, Lucy
Hanley, Janet
McKinstry, Brian
Pinnock, Hilary
author_facet MacNab, Michele
Lee, Siew Hwa
McCloughan, Lucy
Hanley, Janet
McKinstry, Brian
Pinnock, Hilary
author_sort MacNab, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry could potentially contribute to self-monitoring. NHS Lothian’s ‘Light Touch’ service provided COPD patients with a self-management plan based on symptoms and oximetry. The service was overseen (though not actively monitored) by respiratory-trained community teams who were contactable by a telephone helpline. We aimed to assess the feasibility, perceived utility and impact of the ‘Light Touch’ service. METHODS: A before-and-after assessment of St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and use of healthcare resources during the 6-month feasibility study compared to the previous corresponding 6-months. Paired semi-structured interviews with patients at baseline and 6-months, interviews with managers and a focus group of professionals explored perceptions of the service and self-management. Transcripts were coded, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: We recruited 51 participants (mean age 69.7 years (SD 8.4); 21 (46 %) male). 46 participants completed quantitative follow up (2 died, 2 were unwell, 1 refused). SGRQ: 21 (46 %) participants improved by 4 or more (the minimum important difference); 12 (26 %) deteriorated by 4 or more. HADS: more participants had normal scores for anxiety (65 %) and depression (80 %) at 6-months than at baseline (51 and 64 %). More emergency therapy was prescribed during the study period compared to the previous year. Only 18 participants (39 %) contacted the Light Touch Helpline during the 6-month study. Twenty patients provided a total of 36 interviews, 8 clinicians contributed to a focus group and 6 managers were interviewed. Patients considered that the oximetry readings heightened awareness of their condition and gave them confidence to make self-management decisions. Healthcare professionals valued oximetry as a tool for teaching people self-management skills, but were concerned that patients rarely contacted the teams for help or advice during the study. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Light Touch’ shows promise as a low-cost strategy for empowering patients’ self-management skills and reducing reliance on clinical supervision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46241812015-10-29 Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project MacNab, Michele Lee, Siew Hwa McCloughan, Lucy Hanley, Janet McKinstry, Brian Pinnock, Hilary BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry could potentially contribute to self-monitoring. NHS Lothian’s ‘Light Touch’ service provided COPD patients with a self-management plan based on symptoms and oximetry. The service was overseen (though not actively monitored) by respiratory-trained community teams who were contactable by a telephone helpline. We aimed to assess the feasibility, perceived utility and impact of the ‘Light Touch’ service. METHODS: A before-and-after assessment of St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and use of healthcare resources during the 6-month feasibility study compared to the previous corresponding 6-months. Paired semi-structured interviews with patients at baseline and 6-months, interviews with managers and a focus group of professionals explored perceptions of the service and self-management. Transcripts were coded, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: We recruited 51 participants (mean age 69.7 years (SD 8.4); 21 (46 %) male). 46 participants completed quantitative follow up (2 died, 2 were unwell, 1 refused). SGRQ: 21 (46 %) participants improved by 4 or more (the minimum important difference); 12 (26 %) deteriorated by 4 or more. HADS: more participants had normal scores for anxiety (65 %) and depression (80 %) at 6-months than at baseline (51 and 64 %). More emergency therapy was prescribed during the study period compared to the previous year. Only 18 participants (39 %) contacted the Light Touch Helpline during the 6-month study. Twenty patients provided a total of 36 interviews, 8 clinicians contributed to a focus group and 6 managers were interviewed. Patients considered that the oximetry readings heightened awareness of their condition and gave them confidence to make self-management decisions. Healthcare professionals valued oximetry as a tool for teaching people self-management skills, but were concerned that patients rarely contacted the teams for help or advice during the study. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Light Touch’ shows promise as a low-cost strategy for empowering patients’ self-management skills and reducing reliance on clinical supervision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4624181/ /pubmed/26503028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2 Text en © MacNab et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
MacNab, Michele
Lee, Siew Hwa
McCloughan, Lucy
Hanley, Janet
McKinstry, Brian
Pinnock, Hilary
Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title_full Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title_fullStr Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title_full_unstemmed Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title_short Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
title_sort oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2
work_keys_str_mv AT macnabmichele oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject
AT leesiewhwa oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject
AT mccloughanlucy oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject
AT hanleyjanet oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject
AT mckinstrybrian oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject
AT pinnockhilary oximetrysupportedselfmanagementforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasemixedmethodfeasibilitypilotproject