Cargando…

Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates

BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare policies and evidence which promote home dialysis, uptake rates have been falling for over 10 years in England. A target introduced by commissioners in the West Midlands provided a unique opportunity to study how hospitals can increase home-based treatment for a group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Combes, Gill, Allen, Kerry, Sein, Kim, Girling, Alan, Lilford, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0344-8
_version_ 1782397791494995968
author Combes, Gill
Allen, Kerry
Sein, Kim
Girling, Alan
Lilford, Richard
author_facet Combes, Gill
Allen, Kerry
Sein, Kim
Girling, Alan
Lilford, Richard
author_sort Combes, Gill
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare policies and evidence which promote home dialysis, uptake rates have been falling for over 10 years in England. A target introduced by commissioners in the West Midlands provided a unique opportunity to study how hospitals can increase home-based treatment for a group of patients with complex life-threatening conditions. METHODS: Quantitative changes in home treatment uptake rates in seven hospitals in the West Midlands were compared with the rest of England for 3 years pre and post the introduction of the target in 2010, using a logistic regression model. Qualitative interviews in four hospitals with 96 clinical and managerial staff and 93 dialysis patients explored the barriers and facilitators to increasing the uptake of home treatment and the impact of the target. RESULTS: Home treatment uptake rates increased significantly in the seven study hospitals compared with the 3 years prior to the introduction of the target and compared with the rest of England where rates remained static. The four main factors facilitating increased uptake were as follows: the commissioner’s target, linked to financial penalties; additional funding for specialist staff and equipment; committed, visible clinical champions and good systems for patient training and ongoing healthcare support at home. The three main barriers were as follows: lack of training for non-specialist staff, poorly developed patient education and considerable unrecognised and unmet emotional and psychological patient needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact of using targets with financial penalties to achieve change and how hospitals can increase significantly the uptake of home-based self-care for a group of patients with complex medical needs. It provides useful pointers to the main barriers and facilitators, which are likely to be relevant to other groups of patients who could be treated at home. It also highlights two neglected areas which need to improve if patients with life-threatening long-term conditions are to be encouraged to take up home treatment: individualised patient education which allows exploration of the impacts of treatment options and the provision of ongoing emotional support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46241862015-10-29 Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates Combes, Gill Allen, Kerry Sein, Kim Girling, Alan Lilford, Richard Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare policies and evidence which promote home dialysis, uptake rates have been falling for over 10 years in England. A target introduced by commissioners in the West Midlands provided a unique opportunity to study how hospitals can increase home-based treatment for a group of patients with complex life-threatening conditions. METHODS: Quantitative changes in home treatment uptake rates in seven hospitals in the West Midlands were compared with the rest of England for 3 years pre and post the introduction of the target in 2010, using a logistic regression model. Qualitative interviews in four hospitals with 96 clinical and managerial staff and 93 dialysis patients explored the barriers and facilitators to increasing the uptake of home treatment and the impact of the target. RESULTS: Home treatment uptake rates increased significantly in the seven study hospitals compared with the 3 years prior to the introduction of the target and compared with the rest of England where rates remained static. The four main factors facilitating increased uptake were as follows: the commissioner’s target, linked to financial penalties; additional funding for specialist staff and equipment; committed, visible clinical champions and good systems for patient training and ongoing healthcare support at home. The three main barriers were as follows: lack of training for non-specialist staff, poorly developed patient education and considerable unrecognised and unmet emotional and psychological patient needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact of using targets with financial penalties to achieve change and how hospitals can increase significantly the uptake of home-based self-care for a group of patients with complex medical needs. It provides useful pointers to the main barriers and facilitators, which are likely to be relevant to other groups of patients who could be treated at home. It also highlights two neglected areas which need to improve if patients with life-threatening long-term conditions are to be encouraged to take up home treatment: individualised patient education which allows exploration of the impacts of treatment options and the provision of ongoing emotional support. BioMed Central 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4624186/ /pubmed/26507978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0344-8 Text en © Combes et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Combes, Gill
Allen, Kerry
Sein, Kim
Girling, Alan
Lilford, Richard
Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title_full Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title_fullStr Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title_full_unstemmed Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title_short Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
title_sort taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0344-8
work_keys_str_mv AT combesgill takinghospitaltreatmentshomeamixedmethodscasestudylookingatthebarriersandsuccessfactorsforhomedialysistreatmentandtheinfluenceofatargetonuptakerates
AT allenkerry takinghospitaltreatmentshomeamixedmethodscasestudylookingatthebarriersandsuccessfactorsforhomedialysistreatmentandtheinfluenceofatargetonuptakerates
AT seinkim takinghospitaltreatmentshomeamixedmethodscasestudylookingatthebarriersandsuccessfactorsforhomedialysistreatmentandtheinfluenceofatargetonuptakerates
AT girlingalan takinghospitaltreatmentshomeamixedmethodscasestudylookingatthebarriersandsuccessfactorsforhomedialysistreatmentandtheinfluenceofatargetonuptakerates
AT lilfordrichard takinghospitaltreatmentshomeamixedmethodscasestudylookingatthebarriersandsuccessfactorsforhomedialysistreatmentandtheinfluenceofatargetonuptakerates