Cargando…

A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The patient positioning in pelvic radiotherapy (RT) should be decided based on both reproducibility and on which position that yields the lowest radiation dose to the organs at risk (OAR), and thereby less side effects to patients. The present randomized study aimed to evaluate the influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frøseth, Trude C., Strickert, Trond, Solli, Kjersti S., Salvesen, Øyvind, Frykholm, Gunilla, Reidunsdatter, Randi J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26508131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0524-3
_version_ 1782397830750535680
author Frøseth, Trude C.
Strickert, Trond
Solli, Kjersti S.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Frykholm, Gunilla
Reidunsdatter, Randi J.
author_facet Frøseth, Trude C.
Strickert, Trond
Solli, Kjersti S.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Frykholm, Gunilla
Reidunsdatter, Randi J.
author_sort Frøseth, Trude C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The patient positioning in pelvic radiotherapy (RT) should be decided based on both reproducibility and on which position that yields the lowest radiation dose to the organs at risk (OAR), and thereby less side effects to patients. The present randomized study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to OAR in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were randomized into receiving RT in either supine or prone position. The recruitment period was from 2005 to 2008. Position deviations were derived from electronic portal image registrations, and setup errors were defined as deviations between the expected and the actual position of bony landmarks. Setup deviations were expressed into three table shift values (∆x, ∆y, ∆z) from which the deviation vector [Formula: see text] were calculated. The estimated lengths of [Formula: see text] defined the main outcome and were compared between prone and supine positions using linear mixed model statistics. The mean volume of each 5 Gy increments between 5 and 45 Gy was calculated for the small bowel and the total bowel, and the dose volumes were compared between prone and supine position. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Data from 83 patients was evaluable. The mean [Formula: see text] was 5.8 mm in supine position and 7.1 mm in prone position (p = 0.024), hence the reproducibility was significantly superior in supine position. However, the difference was marginal and may have borderline clinical importance. The irradiated volumes of the small bowel and the total bowel were largest in the supine position for all dose levels, but none of those were significantly different. The patient positioning in RT of rectal cancer patients may therefore be decided based on other factors such as the most comfortable position for the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46246572015-10-30 A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients Frøseth, Trude C. Strickert, Trond Solli, Kjersti S. Salvesen, Øyvind Frykholm, Gunilla Reidunsdatter, Randi J. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The patient positioning in pelvic radiotherapy (RT) should be decided based on both reproducibility and on which position that yields the lowest radiation dose to the organs at risk (OAR), and thereby less side effects to patients. The present randomized study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to OAR in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were randomized into receiving RT in either supine or prone position. The recruitment period was from 2005 to 2008. Position deviations were derived from electronic portal image registrations, and setup errors were defined as deviations between the expected and the actual position of bony landmarks. Setup deviations were expressed into three table shift values (∆x, ∆y, ∆z) from which the deviation vector [Formula: see text] were calculated. The estimated lengths of [Formula: see text] defined the main outcome and were compared between prone and supine positions using linear mixed model statistics. The mean volume of each 5 Gy increments between 5 and 45 Gy was calculated for the small bowel and the total bowel, and the dose volumes were compared between prone and supine position. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Data from 83 patients was evaluable. The mean [Formula: see text] was 5.8 mm in supine position and 7.1 mm in prone position (p = 0.024), hence the reproducibility was significantly superior in supine position. However, the difference was marginal and may have borderline clinical importance. The irradiated volumes of the small bowel and the total bowel were largest in the supine position for all dose levels, but none of those were significantly different. The patient positioning in RT of rectal cancer patients may therefore be decided based on other factors such as the most comfortable position for the patients. BioMed Central 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4624657/ /pubmed/26508131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0524-3 Text en © Frøseth et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Frøseth, Trude C.
Strickert, Trond
Solli, Kjersti S.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Frykholm, Gunilla
Reidunsdatter, Randi J.
A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title_full A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title_fullStr A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title_short A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
title_sort randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26508131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0524-3
work_keys_str_mv AT frøsethtrudec arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT strickerttrond arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT sollikjerstis arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT salvesenøyvind arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT frykholmgunilla arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT reidunsdatterrandij arandomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT frøsethtrudec randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT strickerttrond randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT sollikjerstis randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT salvesenøyvind randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT frykholmgunilla randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients
AT reidunsdatterrandij randomizedstudyoftheeffectofpatientpositioningonsetupreproducibilityanddosedistributiontoorgansatriskinradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatients