Cargando…

Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey

BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent for participation in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was established as a mechanism to protect participants against undue harm from research and allow people to recognise any potential risks or benefits associated with the research. A number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gillies, Katie, Entwistle, Vikki, Treweek, Shaun P., Fraser, Cynthia, Williamson, Paula R., Campbell, Marion K.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Study Protocol
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1011-8

Ejemplares similares

Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

EvaLuation of Interventions for informed Consent for randomIsed controlled Trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

An international core outcome set for evaluating interventions to improve informed consent to clinical trials: The ELICIT Study
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
por: El Feky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
por: Elfeky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
por: Elfeky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of a standardised set of metrics for monitoring site performance in multicentre randomised trials: a Delphi study
por: Whitham, Diane, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
por: Gardner, Heidi R, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Patient reported measures of informed consent for clinical trials: A systematic review
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility
por: Langston, Anne L, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self
por: McCann, Sharon K, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
por: Gardner, Heidi R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
por: Black, Mairead, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What, how, when and who of trial results summaries for trial participants: stakeholder-informed guidance from the RECAP project
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Core Outcomes in Ventilation Trials (COVenT): protocol for a core outcome set using a Delphi survey with a nested randomised trial and observational cohort study
por: Blackwood, Bronagh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Recruitment to trials: insights from a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies
por: McCann, Sharon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

‘It's trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial
por: Skea, Zoë Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian
por: Angus, Val C, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Patient participation in Delphi surveys to develop core outcome sets: systematic review
por: Barrington, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Determining items for inclusion in a decision support intervention for clinical trial participation: a modified Delphi approach
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists
por: Gardner, Heidi R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Developing principles for sharing information about potential trial intervention benefits and harms with patients: report of a modified Delphi survey
por: Svobodova, Martina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Providing trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic effectiveness RCTs: a scoping review
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey
por: MacLennan, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set
por: Convie, Liam J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer
por: Fish, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance
por: Biggane, Alice M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale)
por: Shepherd, Victoria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Surgeons’ and methodologists’ perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study
por: Cook, Jonathan A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
por: Coleman, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development
por: Keeley, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: An international key stakeholder consensus study
por: Convie, Liam J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a decision support intervention for consultees and legal representatives of adults lacking capacity to consent (CONSULT): protocol for a randomised Study Within a Trial
por: Shepherd, Victoria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in rosacea: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
por: Iyengar, Sanjana, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Involving people living with dementia in research: an accessible modified Delphi survey for core outcome set development
por: Morbey, Hazel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys
por: Biggane, Alice M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Core concepts of consent in medical practice
por: Thirumoorthy, T
Publicado: (2023)

Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study
por: Snowdon, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_cii3dchjbenrurevmtpj3b7mh9