Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diag...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846 |
_version_ | 1782397849666846720 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Chen Wen-En, Liu Yang-Ming, Li Shan, Luo Yi-Ming, Zhong |
author_facet | Wei, Chen Wen-En, Liu Yang-Ming, Li Shan, Luo Yi-Ming, Zhong |
author_sort | Wei, Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diagnosis of CDI. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for CDI remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, our aim was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP in detection of Clostridium difficile (CD) in stool samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was done in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2014 to identify published studies that evaluated the diagnostic role of LAMP for CD. Methodological quality was assessed according to the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS) instrument. The sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled statistically using random effects models. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Funnel plots were used to test the potential publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE for diagnosing CD were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), respectively. The PLR was 47.72 (95% CI: 15.10–150.82), NLR was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04–0.14) and DOR was 745.19 (95% CI: 229.30−2421.72). The area under the ROC was 0.98. Meta-regression indicated that the total number of samples was a source of heterogeneity for LAMP in detection of CD. The funnel plots suggested no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The LAMP meets the minimum desirable characteristics of a diagnostic test of SEN, SPE and other measures of accuracy in the diagnosis of CD, and it is suitable as a rapid, effective and reliable stand-alone diagnostic test for diagnosis of CDI, potentially decreasing morbidity and nosocomial spread of CD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4624739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46247392015-11-02 Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis Wei, Chen Wen-En, Liu Yang-Ming, Li Shan, Luo Yi-Ming, Zhong Arch Med Sci Systematic review/Meta-analysis INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diagnosis of CDI. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for CDI remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, our aim was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP in detection of Clostridium difficile (CD) in stool samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was done in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2014 to identify published studies that evaluated the diagnostic role of LAMP for CD. Methodological quality was assessed according to the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS) instrument. The sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled statistically using random effects models. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Funnel plots were used to test the potential publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE for diagnosing CD were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), respectively. The PLR was 47.72 (95% CI: 15.10–150.82), NLR was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04–0.14) and DOR was 745.19 (95% CI: 229.30−2421.72). The area under the ROC was 0.98. Meta-regression indicated that the total number of samples was a source of heterogeneity for LAMP in detection of CD. The funnel plots suggested no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The LAMP meets the minimum desirable characteristics of a diagnostic test of SEN, SPE and other measures of accuracy in the diagnosis of CD, and it is suitable as a rapid, effective and reliable stand-alone diagnostic test for diagnosis of CDI, potentially decreasing morbidity and nosocomial spread of CD. Termedia Publishing House 2015-10-12 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4624739/ /pubmed/26528332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic review/Meta-analysis Wei, Chen Wen-En, Liu Yang-Ming, Li Shan, Luo Yi-Ming, Zhong Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic review/Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weichen diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis AT wenenliu diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis AT yangmingli diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis AT shanluo diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis AT yimingzhong diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis |