Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Chen, Wen-En, Liu, Yang-Ming, Li, Shan, Luo, Yi-Ming, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846
_version_ 1782397849666846720
author Wei, Chen
Wen-En, Liu
Yang-Ming, Li
Shan, Luo
Yi-Ming, Zhong
author_facet Wei, Chen
Wen-En, Liu
Yang-Ming, Li
Shan, Luo
Yi-Ming, Zhong
author_sort Wei, Chen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diagnosis of CDI. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for CDI remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, our aim was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP in detection of Clostridium difficile (CD) in stool samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was done in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2014 to identify published studies that evaluated the diagnostic role of LAMP for CD. Methodological quality was assessed according to the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS) instrument. The sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled statistically using random effects models. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Funnel plots were used to test the potential publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE for diagnosing CD were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), respectively. The PLR was 47.72 (95% CI: 15.10–150.82), NLR was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04–0.14) and DOR was 745.19 (95% CI: 229.30−2421.72). The area under the ROC was 0.98. Meta-regression indicated that the total number of samples was a source of heterogeneity for LAMP in detection of CD. The funnel plots suggested no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The LAMP meets the minimum desirable characteristics of a diagnostic test of SEN, SPE and other measures of accuracy in the diagnosis of CD, and it is suitable as a rapid, effective and reliable stand-alone diagnostic test for diagnosis of CDI, potentially decreasing morbidity and nosocomial spread of CD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46247392015-11-02 Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis Wei, Chen Wen-En, Liu Yang-Ming, Li Shan, Luo Yi-Ming, Zhong Arch Med Sci Systematic review/Meta-analysis INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has become readily available for the diagnosis of CDI, and many studies have investigated the usefulness of LAMP for rapid and accurate diagnosis of CDI. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for CDI remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, our aim was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of LAMP in detection of Clostridium difficile (CD) in stool samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was done in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2014 to identify published studies that evaluated the diagnostic role of LAMP for CD. Methodological quality was assessed according to the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS) instrument. The sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled statistically using random effects models. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Funnel plots were used to test the potential publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE for diagnosing CD were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), respectively. The PLR was 47.72 (95% CI: 15.10–150.82), NLR was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04–0.14) and DOR was 745.19 (95% CI: 229.30−2421.72). The area under the ROC was 0.98. Meta-regression indicated that the total number of samples was a source of heterogeneity for LAMP in detection of CD. The funnel plots suggested no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The LAMP meets the minimum desirable characteristics of a diagnostic test of SEN, SPE and other measures of accuracy in the diagnosis of CD, and it is suitable as a rapid, effective and reliable stand-alone diagnostic test for diagnosis of CDI, potentially decreasing morbidity and nosocomial spread of CD. Termedia Publishing House 2015-10-12 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4624739/ /pubmed/26528332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic review/Meta-analysis
Wei, Chen
Wen-En, Liu
Yang-Ming, Li
Shan, Luo
Yi-Ming, Zhong
Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis
topic Systematic review/Meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54846
work_keys_str_mv AT weichen diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis
AT wenenliu diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis
AT yangmingli diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis
AT shanluo diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis
AT yimingzhong diagnosticaccuracyofloopmediatedisothermalamplificationindetectionofclostridiumdifficileinstoolsamplesametaanalysis