Cargando…

Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)

The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is the practice of collecting environmental samples and analyzing them for the presence of a genetic marker specific to a target species. Little is known about the sensitivity of the eDNA method. Sensitivity is the probability that the target marker will be detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schultz, Martin T., Lance, Richard F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141503
_version_ 1782397888526024704
author Schultz, Martin T.
Lance, Richard F.
author_facet Schultz, Martin T.
Lance, Richard F.
author_sort Schultz, Martin T.
collection PubMed
description The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is the practice of collecting environmental samples and analyzing them for the presence of a genetic marker specific to a target species. Little is known about the sensitivity of the eDNA method. Sensitivity is the probability that the target marker will be detected if it is present in the water body. Methods and tools are needed to assess the sensitivity of sampling protocols, design eDNA surveys, and interpret survey results. In this study, the sensitivity of the eDNA method is modeled as a function of ambient target marker concentration. The model accounts for five steps of sample collection and analysis, including: 1) collection of a filtered water sample from the source; 2) extraction of DNA from the filter and isolation in a purified elution; 3) removal of aliquots from the elution for use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay; 4) PCR; and 5) genetic sequencing. The model is applicable to any target species. For demonstration purposes, the model is parameterized for bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) assuming sampling protocols used in the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS). Simulation results show that eDNA surveys have a high false negative rate at low concentrations of the genetic marker. This is attributed to processing of water samples and division of the extraction elution in preparation for the PCR assay. Increases in field survey sensitivity can be achieved by increasing sample volume, sample number, and PCR replicates. Increasing sample volume yields the greatest increase in sensitivity. It is recommended that investigators estimate and communicate the sensitivity of eDNA surveys to help facilitate interpretation of eDNA survey results. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to evaluate the results of surveys in which no water samples test positive for the target marker. It is also recommended that invasive species managers articulate concentration-based sensitivity objectives for eDNA surveys. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to design appropriate sampling protocols. The model provides insights into how sampling protocols can be designed or modified to achieve these sensitivity objectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46249092015-11-06 Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Schultz, Martin T. Lance, Richard F. PLoS One Research Article The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is the practice of collecting environmental samples and analyzing them for the presence of a genetic marker specific to a target species. Little is known about the sensitivity of the eDNA method. Sensitivity is the probability that the target marker will be detected if it is present in the water body. Methods and tools are needed to assess the sensitivity of sampling protocols, design eDNA surveys, and interpret survey results. In this study, the sensitivity of the eDNA method is modeled as a function of ambient target marker concentration. The model accounts for five steps of sample collection and analysis, including: 1) collection of a filtered water sample from the source; 2) extraction of DNA from the filter and isolation in a purified elution; 3) removal of aliquots from the elution for use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay; 4) PCR; and 5) genetic sequencing. The model is applicable to any target species. For demonstration purposes, the model is parameterized for bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) assuming sampling protocols used in the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS). Simulation results show that eDNA surveys have a high false negative rate at low concentrations of the genetic marker. This is attributed to processing of water samples and division of the extraction elution in preparation for the PCR assay. Increases in field survey sensitivity can be achieved by increasing sample volume, sample number, and PCR replicates. Increasing sample volume yields the greatest increase in sensitivity. It is recommended that investigators estimate and communicate the sensitivity of eDNA surveys to help facilitate interpretation of eDNA survey results. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to evaluate the results of surveys in which no water samples test positive for the target marker. It is also recommended that invasive species managers articulate concentration-based sensitivity objectives for eDNA surveys. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to design appropriate sampling protocols. The model provides insights into how sampling protocols can be designed or modified to achieve these sensitivity objectives. Public Library of Science 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4624909/ /pubmed/26509674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141503 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schultz, Martin T.
Lance, Richard F.
Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title_full Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title_fullStr Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title_short Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
title_sort modeling the sensitivity of field surveys for detection of environmental dna (edna)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141503
work_keys_str_mv AT schultzmartint modelingthesensitivityoffieldsurveysfordetectionofenvironmentaldnaedna
AT lancerichardf modelingthesensitivityoffieldsurveysfordetectionofenvironmentaldnaedna