Cargando…

Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: To date, no consensus has emerged on the most appropriate front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label to help consumers in making informed choices. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the label formats currently in use: nutrient-specific, graded and simple summary systems, in a large sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ducrot, Pauline, Méjean, Caroline, Julia, Chantal, Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle, Touvier, Mathilde, Fezeu, Léopold, Hercberg, Serge, Péneau, Sandrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140898
_version_ 1782397904186507264
author Ducrot, Pauline
Méjean, Caroline
Julia, Chantal
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
Touvier, Mathilde
Fezeu, Léopold
Hercberg, Serge
Péneau, Sandrine
author_facet Ducrot, Pauline
Méjean, Caroline
Julia, Chantal
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
Touvier, Mathilde
Fezeu, Léopold
Hercberg, Serge
Péneau, Sandrine
author_sort Ducrot, Pauline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, no consensus has emerged on the most appropriate front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label to help consumers in making informed choices. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the label formats currently in use: nutrient-specific, graded and simple summary systems, in a large sample of adults. METHODS: The FOP label effectiveness was assessed by measuring the label acceptability and understanding among 13,578 participants of the NutriNet-Santé cohort study, representative of the French adult population. Participants were exposed to five conditions, including four FOP labels: Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), 5-Color Nutrition Label (5-CNL), Green Tick (Tick), and a “no label” condition. Acceptability was evaluated by several indicators: attractiveness, liking and perceived cognitive workload. Objective understanding was assessed by the percentage of correct answers when ranking three products according to their nutritional quality. Five different product categories were tested: prepared fish dishes, pizzas, dairy products, breakfast cereals, and appetizers. Differences among the label effectiveness were compared with chi-square tests. RESULTS: The 5-CNL was viewed as the easiest label to identify and as the one requiring the lowest amount of effort and time to understand. GDA was considered as the least easy to identify and to understand, despite being the most attractive and liked label. All FOP labels were found to be effective in ranking products according to their nutritional quality compared with the “no label” situation, although they showed differing levels of effectiveness (p<0.0001). Globally, the 5-CNL performed best, followed by MTL, GDA and Tick labels. CONCLUSIONS: The graded 5-CNL label was considered as easy to identify, simple and rapid to understand; it performed well when comparing the products’ nutritional quality. Therefore, it is likely to present advantages in real shopping situations where choices are usually made quickly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4624978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46249782015-11-06 Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study Ducrot, Pauline Méjean, Caroline Julia, Chantal Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle Touvier, Mathilde Fezeu, Léopold Hercberg, Serge Péneau, Sandrine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To date, no consensus has emerged on the most appropriate front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label to help consumers in making informed choices. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the label formats currently in use: nutrient-specific, graded and simple summary systems, in a large sample of adults. METHODS: The FOP label effectiveness was assessed by measuring the label acceptability and understanding among 13,578 participants of the NutriNet-Santé cohort study, representative of the French adult population. Participants were exposed to five conditions, including four FOP labels: Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), 5-Color Nutrition Label (5-CNL), Green Tick (Tick), and a “no label” condition. Acceptability was evaluated by several indicators: attractiveness, liking and perceived cognitive workload. Objective understanding was assessed by the percentage of correct answers when ranking three products according to their nutritional quality. Five different product categories were tested: prepared fish dishes, pizzas, dairy products, breakfast cereals, and appetizers. Differences among the label effectiveness were compared with chi-square tests. RESULTS: The 5-CNL was viewed as the easiest label to identify and as the one requiring the lowest amount of effort and time to understand. GDA was considered as the least easy to identify and to understand, despite being the most attractive and liked label. All FOP labels were found to be effective in ranking products according to their nutritional quality compared with the “no label” situation, although they showed differing levels of effectiveness (p<0.0001). Globally, the 5-CNL performed best, followed by MTL, GDA and Tick labels. CONCLUSIONS: The graded 5-CNL label was considered as easy to identify, simple and rapid to understand; it performed well when comparing the products’ nutritional quality. Therefore, it is likely to present advantages in real shopping situations where choices are usually made quickly. Public Library of Science 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4624978/ /pubmed/26509679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140898 Text en © 2015 Ducrot et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ducrot, Pauline
Méjean, Caroline
Julia, Chantal
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
Touvier, Mathilde
Fezeu, Léopold
Hercberg, Serge
Péneau, Sandrine
Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_full Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_short Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_sort effectiveness of front-of-pack nutrition labels in french adults: results from the nutrinet-santé cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140898
work_keys_str_mv AT ducrotpauline effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT mejeancaroline effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT juliachantal effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT kesseguyotemmanuelle effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT touviermathilde effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT fezeuleopold effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT hercbergserge effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT peneausandrine effectivenessoffrontofpacknutritionlabelsinfrenchadultsresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy