Cargando…

Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation

BACKGROUND: Conflicting reports in the literature have raised the question whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) devices and vibrating massage devices have similar energy signatures and, hence, cause similar bioeffects in treated tissues. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used laser fiber...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Császár, Nikolaus B. M., Angstman, Nicholas B., Milz, Stefan, Sprecher, Christoph M., Kobel, Philippe, Farhat, Mohamed, Furia, John P., Schmitz, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140541
_version_ 1782397910120398848
author Császár, Nikolaus B. M.
Angstman, Nicholas B.
Milz, Stefan
Sprecher, Christoph M.
Kobel, Philippe
Farhat, Mohamed
Furia, John P.
Schmitz, Christoph
author_facet Császár, Nikolaus B. M.
Angstman, Nicholas B.
Milz, Stefan
Sprecher, Christoph M.
Kobel, Philippe
Farhat, Mohamed
Furia, John P.
Schmitz, Christoph
author_sort Császár, Nikolaus B. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conflicting reports in the literature have raised the question whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) devices and vibrating massage devices have similar energy signatures and, hence, cause similar bioeffects in treated tissues. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used laser fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH) measurements, high-speed imaging and x-ray film analysis to compare fundamental elements of the energy signatures of two rESWT devices (Swiss DolorClast; Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland; D-Actor 200; Storz Medical, Tägerwillen, Switzerland) and a vibrating massage device (Vibracare; G5/General Physiotherapy, Inc., Earth City, MO, USA). To assert potential bioeffects of these treatment modalities we investigated the influence of rESWT and vibrating massage devices on locomotion ability of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) worms. RESULTS: FOPH measurements demonstrated that both rESWT devices generated acoustic waves with comparable pressure and energy flux density. Furthermore, both rESWT devices generated cavitation as evidenced by high-speed imaging and caused mechanical damage on the surface of x-ray film. The vibrating massage device did not show any of these characteristics. Moreover, locomotion ability of C. elegans was statistically significantly impaired after exposure to radial extracorporeal shock waves but was unaffected after exposure of worms to the vibrating massage device. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that both energy signature and bioeffects of rESWT devices are fundamentally different from those of vibrating massage devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prior ESWT studies have shown that tissues treated with sufficient quantities of acoustic sound waves undergo cavitation build-up, mechanotransduction, and ultimately, a biological alteration that “kick-starts” the healing response. Due to their different treatment indications and contra-indications rESWT devices cannot be equated to vibrating massage devices and should be used with due caution in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46250042015-11-06 Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation Császár, Nikolaus B. M. Angstman, Nicholas B. Milz, Stefan Sprecher, Christoph M. Kobel, Philippe Farhat, Mohamed Furia, John P. Schmitz, Christoph PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Conflicting reports in the literature have raised the question whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) devices and vibrating massage devices have similar energy signatures and, hence, cause similar bioeffects in treated tissues. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used laser fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH) measurements, high-speed imaging and x-ray film analysis to compare fundamental elements of the energy signatures of two rESWT devices (Swiss DolorClast; Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland; D-Actor 200; Storz Medical, Tägerwillen, Switzerland) and a vibrating massage device (Vibracare; G5/General Physiotherapy, Inc., Earth City, MO, USA). To assert potential bioeffects of these treatment modalities we investigated the influence of rESWT and vibrating massage devices on locomotion ability of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) worms. RESULTS: FOPH measurements demonstrated that both rESWT devices generated acoustic waves with comparable pressure and energy flux density. Furthermore, both rESWT devices generated cavitation as evidenced by high-speed imaging and caused mechanical damage on the surface of x-ray film. The vibrating massage device did not show any of these characteristics. Moreover, locomotion ability of C. elegans was statistically significantly impaired after exposure to radial extracorporeal shock waves but was unaffected after exposure of worms to the vibrating massage device. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that both energy signature and bioeffects of rESWT devices are fundamentally different from those of vibrating massage devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prior ESWT studies have shown that tissues treated with sufficient quantities of acoustic sound waves undergo cavitation build-up, mechanotransduction, and ultimately, a biological alteration that “kick-starts” the healing response. Due to their different treatment indications and contra-indications rESWT devices cannot be equated to vibrating massage devices and should be used with due caution in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4625004/ /pubmed/26509573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140541 Text en © 2015 Császár et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Császár, Nikolaus B. M.
Angstman, Nicholas B.
Milz, Stefan
Sprecher, Christoph M.
Kobel, Philippe
Farhat, Mohamed
Furia, John P.
Schmitz, Christoph
Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title_full Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title_fullStr Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title_full_unstemmed Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title_short Radial Shock Wave Devices Generate Cavitation
title_sort radial shock wave devices generate cavitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140541
work_keys_str_mv AT csaszarnikolausbm radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT angstmannicholasb radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT milzstefan radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT sprecherchristophm radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT kobelphilippe radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT farhatmohamed radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT furiajohnp radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation
AT schmitzchristoph radialshockwavedevicesgeneratecavitation