Cargando…
Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult bili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4 |
_version_ | 1782397972805320704 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Jin Hong Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu Kim, Soon Sun Kang, Joon Koo Kim, Min Kyeong |
author_facet | Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Jin Hong Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu Kim, Soon Sun Kang, Joon Koo Kim, Min Kyeong |
author_sort | Yang, Min Jae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed between July 2009 and November 2014 at a single tertiary referral center. WGC-PS or DGT was performed in patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct (PD) was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique. In those cases, we used the WGC-PS technique from July 2009 to January 2012 (WGC-PS group), and the DGT technique from February 2012 to November 2014 (DGT group). In the DGT group, WGC-PS was sequentially performed if successful biliary cannulation was not achieved during the DGT attempt. Consecutive patients who underwent DGT and/or WGC-PS with the aim of selective biliary cannulation were enrolled. The primary outcome parameter was the rate of initial successful biliary cannulation. RESULTS: During the study period 3270 ERCPs were performed and a total of 177 patients were enrolled. The rate of initial successful cannulation was 66.7 % (60/90) in the WGC-PS group and 70.1 % (61/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.632). In 26 cases of failed DGT, WGC-PS was sequentially performed in the DGT group, and cannulation was successful in 14 of these patients. The rate of successful cannulation without the needle-knife precut technique was significantly higher in the DGT group compared with the WGC-PS group (75/87, 86.2 % vs. 60/90, 66.7 %, P = 0.003). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 3.3 % (3/90) in the WGC-PS group and 10.3 % (9/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and PD access was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique, both WGC-PS and DGT were equally effective. Furthermore, the stepwise approach using DGT followed by WGC-PS as needed facilitated successful biliary cannulation and reduced the need for the needle-knife precut technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4625430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46254302015-10-30 Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Jin Hong Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu Kim, Soon Sun Kang, Joon Koo Kim, Min Kyeong BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed between July 2009 and November 2014 at a single tertiary referral center. WGC-PS or DGT was performed in patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct (PD) was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique. In those cases, we used the WGC-PS technique from July 2009 to January 2012 (WGC-PS group), and the DGT technique from February 2012 to November 2014 (DGT group). In the DGT group, WGC-PS was sequentially performed if successful biliary cannulation was not achieved during the DGT attempt. Consecutive patients who underwent DGT and/or WGC-PS with the aim of selective biliary cannulation were enrolled. The primary outcome parameter was the rate of initial successful biliary cannulation. RESULTS: During the study period 3270 ERCPs were performed and a total of 177 patients were enrolled. The rate of initial successful cannulation was 66.7 % (60/90) in the WGC-PS group and 70.1 % (61/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.632). In 26 cases of failed DGT, WGC-PS was sequentially performed in the DGT group, and cannulation was successful in 14 of these patients. The rate of successful cannulation without the needle-knife precut technique was significantly higher in the DGT group compared with the WGC-PS group (75/87, 86.2 % vs. 60/90, 66.7 %, P = 0.003). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 3.3 % (3/90) in the WGC-PS group and 10.3 % (9/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and PD access was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique, both WGC-PS and DGT were equally effective. Furthermore, the stepwise approach using DGT followed by WGC-PS as needed facilitated successful biliary cannulation and reduced the need for the needle-knife precut technique. BioMed Central 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4625430/ /pubmed/26510825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4 Text en © Yang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Jin Hong Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu Kim, Soon Sun Kang, Joon Koo Kim, Min Kyeong Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title | Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title_full | Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title_fullStr | Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title_short | Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
title_sort | wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangminjae wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT hwangjaechul wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT yoobyungmoo wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT kimjinhong wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT ryuhyoungkyu wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT kimsoonsun wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT kangjoonkoo wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation AT kimminkyeong wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation |