Cargando…

Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation

BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult bili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Min Jae, Hwang, Jae Chul, Yoo, Byung Moo, Kim, Jin Hong, Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu, Kim, Soon Sun, Kang, Joon Koo, Kim, Min Kyeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4
_version_ 1782397972805320704
author Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Jin Hong
Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu
Kim, Soon Sun
Kang, Joon Koo
Kim, Min Kyeong
author_facet Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Jin Hong
Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu
Kim, Soon Sun
Kang, Joon Koo
Kim, Min Kyeong
author_sort Yang, Min Jae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed between July 2009 and November 2014 at a single tertiary referral center. WGC-PS or DGT was performed in patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct (PD) was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique. In those cases, we used the WGC-PS technique from July 2009 to January 2012 (WGC-PS group), and the DGT technique from February 2012 to November 2014 (DGT group). In the DGT group, WGC-PS was sequentially performed if successful biliary cannulation was not achieved during the DGT attempt. Consecutive patients who underwent DGT and/or WGC-PS with the aim of selective biliary cannulation were enrolled. The primary outcome parameter was the rate of initial successful biliary cannulation. RESULTS: During the study period 3270 ERCPs were performed and a total of 177 patients were enrolled. The rate of initial successful cannulation was 66.7 % (60/90) in the WGC-PS group and 70.1 % (61/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.632). In 26 cases of failed DGT, WGC-PS was sequentially performed in the DGT group, and cannulation was successful in 14 of these patients. The rate of successful cannulation without the needle-knife precut technique was significantly higher in the DGT group compared with the WGC-PS group (75/87, 86.2 % vs. 60/90, 66.7 %, P = 0.003). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 3.3 % (3/90) in the WGC-PS group and 10.3 % (9/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and PD access was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique, both WGC-PS and DGT were equally effective. Furthermore, the stepwise approach using DGT followed by WGC-PS as needed facilitated successful biliary cannulation and reduced the need for the needle-knife precut technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46254302015-10-30 Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Jin Hong Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu Kim, Soon Sun Kang, Joon Koo Kim, Min Kyeong BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, the use of wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS) or the double guidewire technique (DGT) may facilitate biliary cannulation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of WGC-PS and DGT in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed between July 2009 and November 2014 at a single tertiary referral center. WGC-PS or DGT was performed in patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct (PD) was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique. In those cases, we used the WGC-PS technique from July 2009 to January 2012 (WGC-PS group), and the DGT technique from February 2012 to November 2014 (DGT group). In the DGT group, WGC-PS was sequentially performed if successful biliary cannulation was not achieved during the DGT attempt. Consecutive patients who underwent DGT and/or WGC-PS with the aim of selective biliary cannulation were enrolled. The primary outcome parameter was the rate of initial successful biliary cannulation. RESULTS: During the study period 3270 ERCPs were performed and a total of 177 patients were enrolled. The rate of initial successful cannulation was 66.7 % (60/90) in the WGC-PS group and 70.1 % (61/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.632). In 26 cases of failed DGT, WGC-PS was sequentially performed in the DGT group, and cannulation was successful in 14 of these patients. The rate of successful cannulation without the needle-knife precut technique was significantly higher in the DGT group compared with the WGC-PS group (75/87, 86.2 % vs. 60/90, 66.7 %, P = 0.003). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 3.3 % (3/90) in the WGC-PS group and 10.3 % (9/87) in the DGT group (P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In patients for whom biliary cannulation was difficult and PD access was inadvertently achieved while attempting the standard WGC technique, both WGC-PS and DGT were equally effective. Furthermore, the stepwise approach using DGT followed by WGC-PS as needed facilitated successful biliary cannulation and reduced the need for the needle-knife precut technique. BioMed Central 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4625430/ /pubmed/26510825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4 Text en © Yang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Jin Hong
Ryu, Hyoung-Kyu
Kim, Soon Sun
Kang, Joon Koo
Kim, Min Kyeong
Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title_full Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title_fullStr Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title_full_unstemmed Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title_short Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
title_sort wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent versus double guidewire technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0381-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yangminjae wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT hwangjaechul wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT yoobyungmoo wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT kimjinhong wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT ryuhyoungkyu wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT kimsoonsun wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT kangjoonkoo wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation
AT kimminkyeong wireguidedcannulationoverapancreaticstentversusdoubleguidewiretechniqueinpatientswithdifficultbiliarycannulation