Cargando…

Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity

BACKGROUND: Previous studies described cases of Ocriplasmin injections in patients with vitreo-macular traction and reduced central visual acuity. We describe the first case of a patient with 20/20 visual acuity and vitreo-macular traction treated with Ocriplasmin, and, for the first time in literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Settimio, Orrico, Ada, Melillo, Paolo, Testa, Francesco, Simonelli, Francesca, Della Corte, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0141-9
_version_ 1782397976017108992
author Rossi, Settimio
Orrico, Ada
Melillo, Paolo
Testa, Francesco
Simonelli, Francesca
Della Corte, Michele
author_facet Rossi, Settimio
Orrico, Ada
Melillo, Paolo
Testa, Francesco
Simonelli, Francesca
Della Corte, Michele
author_sort Rossi, Settimio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies described cases of Ocriplasmin injections in patients with vitreo-macular traction and reduced central visual acuity. We describe the first case of a patient with 20/20 visual acuity and vitreo-macular traction treated with Ocriplasmin, and, for the first time in literature, we evaluated the functional changes of the macula in response to pharmacological treatment through multifocal-electroretinogram. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a female Caucasian patient aged 67 years with vitreo-macular traction in the right eye, treated with Ocriplasmin, at the Eye Clinic of the Second University of Naples. Visual acuity was 20/20 before treatment, associated with metamorphopsia. Two weeks after injection, optical coherence tomography showed the release of vitreo-macular traction and multifocal electroretinogram responses showed a significant increase of retinal density responses in all six rings (p < 0.03). Visual acuity remained constant with resolution of symptoms and the appearance of vitreous floaters. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of Ocriplasmin resulted to be a safe and effective treatment in the case here reported. Our data show that the anatomical recovery with release of vitreo-macular traction was associated with a full functional recovery. In fact, the electrical retinal density response of the macular area improved two weeks after Ocriplasmin injection. Further studies with broader inclusion criteria for Ocriplasmin treatment (e.g. also with visual acuity higher than 20/25) on a larger study sample are needed to confirm our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46254442015-10-30 Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity Rossi, Settimio Orrico, Ada Melillo, Paolo Testa, Francesco Simonelli, Francesca Della Corte, Michele BMC Ophthalmol Case Report BACKGROUND: Previous studies described cases of Ocriplasmin injections in patients with vitreo-macular traction and reduced central visual acuity. We describe the first case of a patient with 20/20 visual acuity and vitreo-macular traction treated with Ocriplasmin, and, for the first time in literature, we evaluated the functional changes of the macula in response to pharmacological treatment through multifocal-electroretinogram. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a female Caucasian patient aged 67 years with vitreo-macular traction in the right eye, treated with Ocriplasmin, at the Eye Clinic of the Second University of Naples. Visual acuity was 20/20 before treatment, associated with metamorphopsia. Two weeks after injection, optical coherence tomography showed the release of vitreo-macular traction and multifocal electroretinogram responses showed a significant increase of retinal density responses in all six rings (p < 0.03). Visual acuity remained constant with resolution of symptoms and the appearance of vitreous floaters. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of Ocriplasmin resulted to be a safe and effective treatment in the case here reported. Our data show that the anatomical recovery with release of vitreo-macular traction was associated with a full functional recovery. In fact, the electrical retinal density response of the macular area improved two weeks after Ocriplasmin injection. Further studies with broader inclusion criteria for Ocriplasmin treatment (e.g. also with visual acuity higher than 20/25) on a larger study sample are needed to confirm our results. BioMed Central 2015-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4625444/ /pubmed/26511080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0141-9 Text en © Rossi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Rossi, Settimio
Orrico, Ada
Melillo, Paolo
Testa, Francesco
Simonelli, Francesca
Della Corte, Michele
Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title_full Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title_fullStr Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title_full_unstemmed Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title_short Ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
title_sort ocriplasmin use in a selected case with preserved visual acuity
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0141-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rossisettimio ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity
AT orricoada ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity
AT melillopaolo ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity
AT testafrancesco ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity
AT simonellifrancesca ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity
AT dellacortemichele ocriplasminuseinaselectedcasewithpreservedvisualacuity