Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis

BACKGROUND: Although widely applied, the cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLT) for varicose veins has not been established. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the evaluation of EVLT for the treatment of uncomplicated varicose veins by using published data from ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luebke, Thomas, Brunkwall, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0130-1
_version_ 1782398030296645632
author Luebke, Thomas
Brunkwall, Jan
author_facet Luebke, Thomas
Brunkwall, Jan
author_sort Luebke, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although widely applied, the cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLT) for varicose veins has not been established. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the evaluation of EVLT for the treatment of uncomplicated varicose veins by using published data from randomizd clinical trials regarding the costs and the quality of life. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 6 months following treatment was calculated. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the uncertainty associated with the results of our analysis. RESULTS: Over the time horizon of 1–6 months, it was found that the incremental cost of EVLT compared with conventional surgery was €466.66 and the incremental effect was −0.007 QALY at 1 month, −0.0075 QALY at 3 months and 0.0 QALY at 6 months. This shows that the strategy “EVLT” was dominated by the strategy “HL/S” at any time point for the base cases analyses. The results of various alternative economic evaluations indicated that EVLT may be a potentially cost effective (i.e. incremental cost effectiveness ratio of between €12158.67 and €514721.67 per QALY, respectively) treatment option compared to conventional surgical treatment for varicose veins with a certainty between 54.9 and 98.8 %. CONCLUSION: For patients with uncomplicated varicose veins and evidence of saphenofemoral reflux, surgical treatment for varicose veins offers a robust health benefit for relatively less costs compared to EVLT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46258022015-10-30 Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis Luebke, Thomas Brunkwall, Jan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although widely applied, the cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLT) for varicose veins has not been established. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the evaluation of EVLT for the treatment of uncomplicated varicose veins by using published data from randomizd clinical trials regarding the costs and the quality of life. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 6 months following treatment was calculated. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the uncertainty associated with the results of our analysis. RESULTS: Over the time horizon of 1–6 months, it was found that the incremental cost of EVLT compared with conventional surgery was €466.66 and the incremental effect was −0.007 QALY at 1 month, −0.0075 QALY at 3 months and 0.0 QALY at 6 months. This shows that the strategy “EVLT” was dominated by the strategy “HL/S” at any time point for the base cases analyses. The results of various alternative economic evaluations indicated that EVLT may be a potentially cost effective (i.e. incremental cost effectiveness ratio of between €12158.67 and €514721.67 per QALY, respectively) treatment option compared to conventional surgical treatment for varicose veins with a certainty between 54.9 and 98.8 %. CONCLUSION: For patients with uncomplicated varicose veins and evidence of saphenofemoral reflux, surgical treatment for varicose veins offers a robust health benefit for relatively less costs compared to EVLT. BioMed Central 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4625802/ /pubmed/26510413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0130-1 Text en © Luebke and Brunkwall. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luebke, Thomas
Brunkwall, Jan
Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title_full Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title_short Cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with uncomplicated primary varicosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0130-1
work_keys_str_mv AT luebkethomas costeffectivenessofendovenouslaserablationofthegreatsaphenousveininpatientswithuncomplicatedprimaryvaricosis
AT brunkwalljan costeffectivenessofendovenouslaserablationofthegreatsaphenousveininpatientswithuncomplicatedprimaryvaricosis