Cargando…

Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform

INTRODUCTION: Under the Massachusetts health reform, low income residents (those with incomes below 150 % of the Federal Poverty Level [FPL]) were eligible for Medicaid and health insurance exchange-based plans with minimal cost-sharing and no premiums. Those with slightly higher incomes (150 %-300 ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zallman, Leah, Nardin, Rachel, Sayah, Assaad, McCormick, Danny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0235-2
_version_ 1782398046242340864
author Zallman, Leah
Nardin, Rachel
Sayah, Assaad
McCormick, Danny
author_facet Zallman, Leah
Nardin, Rachel
Sayah, Assaad
McCormick, Danny
author_sort Zallman, Leah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Under the Massachusetts health reform, low income residents (those with incomes below 150 % of the Federal Poverty Level [FPL]) were eligible for Medicaid and health insurance exchange-based plans with minimal cost-sharing and no premiums. Those with slightly higher incomes (150 %-300 % FPL) were eligible for exchange-based plans that required cost-sharing and premium payments. METHODS: We conducted face to face surveys in four languages with a convenience sample of 976 patients seeking care at three hospital emergency departments five years after Massachusetts reform. We compared perceived affordability of insurance, financial burden, and satisfaction among low cost sharing plan recipients (recipients of Medicaid and insurance exchange-based plans with minimal cost-sharing and no premiums), high cost sharing plan recipients (recipients of exchange-based plans that required cost-sharing and premium payments) and the commercially insured. RESULTS: We found that despite having higher incomes, higher cost-sharing plan recipients were less satisfied with their insurance plans and perceived more difficulty affording their insurance than those with low cost-sharing plans. Higher cost-sharing plan recipients also reported more difficulty affording medical and non-medical health care as well as insurance premiums than those with commercial insurance. In contrast, patients with low cost-sharing public plans reported higher plan satisfaction and less financial concern than the commercially insured. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers with responsibility for the benefit design of public insurance available under health care reforms in the U.S. should calibrate cost-sharing to income level so as to minimize difficulty affording care and financial burdens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-015-0235-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46259272015-10-30 Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform Zallman, Leah Nardin, Rachel Sayah, Assaad McCormick, Danny Int J Equity Health Research INTRODUCTION: Under the Massachusetts health reform, low income residents (those with incomes below 150 % of the Federal Poverty Level [FPL]) were eligible for Medicaid and health insurance exchange-based plans with minimal cost-sharing and no premiums. Those with slightly higher incomes (150 %-300 % FPL) were eligible for exchange-based plans that required cost-sharing and premium payments. METHODS: We conducted face to face surveys in four languages with a convenience sample of 976 patients seeking care at three hospital emergency departments five years after Massachusetts reform. We compared perceived affordability of insurance, financial burden, and satisfaction among low cost sharing plan recipients (recipients of Medicaid and insurance exchange-based plans with minimal cost-sharing and no premiums), high cost sharing plan recipients (recipients of exchange-based plans that required cost-sharing and premium payments) and the commercially insured. RESULTS: We found that despite having higher incomes, higher cost-sharing plan recipients were less satisfied with their insurance plans and perceived more difficulty affording their insurance than those with low cost-sharing plans. Higher cost-sharing plan recipients also reported more difficulty affording medical and non-medical health care as well as insurance premiums than those with commercial insurance. In contrast, patients with low cost-sharing public plans reported higher plan satisfaction and less financial concern than the commercially insured. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers with responsibility for the benefit design of public insurance available under health care reforms in the U.S. should calibrate cost-sharing to income level so as to minimize difficulty affording care and financial burdens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-015-0235-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4625927/ /pubmed/26511105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0235-2 Text en © Zallman et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zallman, Leah
Nardin, Rachel
Sayah, Assaad
McCormick, Danny
Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title_full Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title_fullStr Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title_full_unstemmed Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title_short Perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to Massachusetts health reform
title_sort perceived affordability of health insurance and medical financial burdens five years in to massachusetts health reform
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0235-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zallmanleah perceivedaffordabilityofhealthinsuranceandmedicalfinancialburdensfiveyearsintomassachusettshealthreform
AT nardinrachel perceivedaffordabilityofhealthinsuranceandmedicalfinancialburdensfiveyearsintomassachusettshealthreform
AT sayahassaad perceivedaffordabilityofhealthinsuranceandmedicalfinancialburdensfiveyearsintomassachusettshealthreform
AT mccormickdanny perceivedaffordabilityofhealthinsuranceandmedicalfinancialburdensfiveyearsintomassachusettshealthreform