Cargando…

Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate changes in intrathoracic pressure (Ppl), airway pressure (Paw) and vital organ perfusion pressures during standard and intrathoracic pressure regulation (IPR)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Multiple CPR intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Younghoon, Debaty, Guillaume, Puertas, Laura, Metzger, Anja, Rees, Jennifer, McKnite, Scott, Yannopoulos, Demetris, Lurie, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0164-5
_version_ 1782398049992048640
author Kwon, Younghoon
Debaty, Guillaume
Puertas, Laura
Metzger, Anja
Rees, Jennifer
McKnite, Scott
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Lurie, Keith
author_facet Kwon, Younghoon
Debaty, Guillaume
Puertas, Laura
Metzger, Anja
Rees, Jennifer
McKnite, Scott
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Lurie, Keith
author_sort Kwon, Younghoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate changes in intrathoracic pressure (Ppl), airway pressure (Paw) and vital organ perfusion pressures during standard and intrathoracic pressure regulation (IPR)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Multiple CPR interventions were assessed, including newer ones based upon IPR, a therapy that enhances negative intrathoracic pressure after each positive pressure breath. Eight anesthetized pigs underwent 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 2 min each of sequential interventions: (1) conventional standard CPR (STD), (2) automated active compression decompression (ACD) CPR, (3) ACD+ an impedance threshold device (ITD) CPR or (4) ACD+ an intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR) CPR, the latter two representing IPR-based CPR therapies. Intrapleural (Ppl), airway (Paw), right atrial, intracranial, and aortic pressures, along with carotid blood flow and end tidal CO(2), were measured and compared during each CPR intervention. RESULTS: The lowest mean and decompression phase Ppl were observed with IPR-based therapies [Ppl mean (mean ± SE): STD (0.8 ± 1.1 mmHg); ACD (−1.6 ± 1.6); ACD-ITD (−3.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD); ACD-ITPR (−7.0 ± 1.9, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD)] [Ppl decompression (mean ± SE): STD (−6.3 ± 2.2); ACD (−13.0 ± 3.8); ACD-ITD −16.9 ± 3.6, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD); ACD-ITPR −18.7 ± 3.5, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD)]. Interventions with the lower mean or decompression phase Ppl also demonstrated lower Paw and were associated with higher vital organ perfusion pressures. CONCLUSIONS: IPR-based CPR methods, specifically ACD-ITPR, yielded the most pronounced reduction in both Ppl and Paw and resulted in the most favorable augmentation of hemodynamics during CPR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0164-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4625943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46259432015-10-30 Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study Kwon, Younghoon Debaty, Guillaume Puertas, Laura Metzger, Anja Rees, Jennifer McKnite, Scott Yannopoulos, Demetris Lurie, Keith Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate changes in intrathoracic pressure (Ppl), airway pressure (Paw) and vital organ perfusion pressures during standard and intrathoracic pressure regulation (IPR)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Multiple CPR interventions were assessed, including newer ones based upon IPR, a therapy that enhances negative intrathoracic pressure after each positive pressure breath. Eight anesthetized pigs underwent 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 2 min each of sequential interventions: (1) conventional standard CPR (STD), (2) automated active compression decompression (ACD) CPR, (3) ACD+ an impedance threshold device (ITD) CPR or (4) ACD+ an intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR) CPR, the latter two representing IPR-based CPR therapies. Intrapleural (Ppl), airway (Paw), right atrial, intracranial, and aortic pressures, along with carotid blood flow and end tidal CO(2), were measured and compared during each CPR intervention. RESULTS: The lowest mean and decompression phase Ppl were observed with IPR-based therapies [Ppl mean (mean ± SE): STD (0.8 ± 1.1 mmHg); ACD (−1.6 ± 1.6); ACD-ITD (−3.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD); ACD-ITPR (−7.0 ± 1.9, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD)] [Ppl decompression (mean ± SE): STD (−6.3 ± 2.2); ACD (−13.0 ± 3.8); ACD-ITD −16.9 ± 3.6, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD); ACD-ITPR −18.7 ± 3.5, p < 0.05 vs. both STD and ACD)]. Interventions with the lower mean or decompression phase Ppl also demonstrated lower Paw and were associated with higher vital organ perfusion pressures. CONCLUSIONS: IPR-based CPR methods, specifically ACD-ITPR, yielded the most pronounced reduction in both Ppl and Paw and resulted in the most favorable augmentation of hemodynamics during CPR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0164-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4625943/ /pubmed/26511270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0164-5 Text en © Kwon et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kwon, Younghoon
Debaty, Guillaume
Puertas, Laura
Metzger, Anja
Rees, Jennifer
McKnite, Scott
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Lurie, Keith
Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title_full Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title_fullStr Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title_short Effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
title_sort effect of regulating airway pressure on intrathoracic pressure and vital organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-randomized interventional cross-over study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0164-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonyounghoon effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT debatyguillaume effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT puertaslaura effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT metzgeranja effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT reesjennifer effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT mcknitescott effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT yannopoulosdemetris effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy
AT luriekeith effectofregulatingairwaypressureonintrathoracicpressureandvitalorganperfusionpressureduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanonrandomizedinterventionalcrossoverstudy