Cargando…
Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods
We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26492259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121013118 |
_version_ | 1782398205192830976 |
---|---|
author | Edagawa, Akiko Kimura, Akio Kawabuchi-Kurata, Takako Adachi, Shinichi Furuhata, Katsunori Miyamoto, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Edagawa, Akiko Kimura, Akio Kawabuchi-Kurata, Takako Adachi, Shinichi Furuhata, Katsunori Miyamoto, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Edagawa, Akiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4627020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46270202015-11-12 Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods Edagawa, Akiko Kimura, Akio Kawabuchi-Kurata, Takako Adachi, Shinichi Furuhata, Katsunori Miyamoto, Hiroshi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples. MDPI 2015-10-19 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4627020/ /pubmed/26492259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121013118 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Edagawa, Akiko Kimura, Akio Kawabuchi-Kurata, Takako Adachi, Shinichi Furuhata, Katsunori Miyamoto, Hiroshi Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title | Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title_full | Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title_fullStr | Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title_short | Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods |
title_sort | investigation of legionella contamination in bath water samples by culture, amoebic co-culture, and real-time quantitative pcr methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26492259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121013118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edagawaakiko investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods AT kimuraakio investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods AT kawabuchikuratatakako investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods AT adachishinichi investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods AT furuhatakatsunori investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods AT miyamotohiroshi investigationoflegionellacontaminationinbathwatersamplesbycultureamoebiccocultureandrealtimequantitativepcrmethods |